linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V3 1/1] mdadm/super1: Add MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT if kernel>=5.4
@ 2023-10-17 12:35 Xiao Ni
  2023-10-17 14:12 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Xiao Ni @ 2023-10-17 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jes; +Cc: mariusz.tkaczyk, colyli, neilb, linux-raid

After and include kernel v5.4, it adds one feature bit MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT.
It must need to specify a layout for raid0 with more than one zone. But for
raid0 with one zone, in fact it also has a defalut layout.

Now for raid0 with one zone, *unknown* layout can be seen when running mdadm -D
command. It's the reason that mdadm doesn't set MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT for
raid0 with one zone. Then in kernel space, super_1_validate sets mddev->layout
to -1 because of no MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT. In fact, in raid0 io path, it
uses the default layout. Set raid0_need_layout to true if kernel_version<=v5.4.

Fixes: 329dfc28debb ('Create: add support for RAID0 layouts.')
Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
---
 super1.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
index 856b02082662..1da71b98d29e 100644
--- a/super1.c
+++ b/super1.c
@@ -1967,6 +1967,14 @@ fail_to_write:
 	return 1;
 }
 
+static bool has_raid0_layout(struct mdp_superblock_1 *sb)
+{
+	if (sb->level == 0 && sb->layout != 0)
+		return true;
+	else
+		return false;
+}
+
 static int write_init_super1(struct supertype *st)
 {
 	struct mdp_superblock_1 *sb = st->sb;
@@ -1978,12 +1986,17 @@ static int write_init_super1(struct supertype *st)
 	unsigned long long sb_offset;
 	unsigned long long data_offset;
 	long bm_offset;
-	int raid0_need_layout = 0;
+	bool raid0_need_layout = false;
+
+	/* Since linux kernel v5.4, raid0 always has a layout */
+	if (has_raid0_layout(sb) && get_linux_version() >= 5004000)
+		raid0_need_layout = true;
 
 	for (di = st->info; di; di = di->next) {
 		if (di->disk.state & (1 << MD_DISK_JOURNAL))
 			sb->feature_map |= __cpu_to_le32(MD_FEATURE_JOURNAL);
-		if (sb->level == 0 && sb->layout != 0) {
+		if (has_raid0_layout(sb) && !raid0_need_layout) {
+
 			struct devinfo *di2 = st->info;
 			unsigned long long s1, s2;
 			s1 = di->dev_size;
@@ -1995,7 +2008,7 @@ static int write_init_super1(struct supertype *st)
 				s2 -= di2->data_offset;
 			s2 /= __le32_to_cpu(sb->chunksize);
 			if (s1 != s2)
-				raid0_need_layout = 1;
+				raid0_need_layout = true;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.32.0 (Apple Git-132)


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V3 1/1] mdadm/super1: Add MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT if kernel>=5.4
  2023-10-17 12:35 [PATCH V3 1/1] mdadm/super1: Add MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT if kernel>=5.4 Xiao Ni
@ 2023-10-17 14:12 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
  2023-10-26 21:49   ` Jes Sorensen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mariusz Tkaczyk @ 2023-10-17 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xiao Ni; +Cc: jes, colyli, neilb, linux-raid

On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 20:35:46 +0800
Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> wrote:

> After and include kernel v5.4, it adds one feature bit
> MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT. It must need to specify a layout for raid0 with more
> than one zone. But for raid0 with one zone, in fact it also has a defalut
> layout.
> 
> Now for raid0 with one zone, *unknown* layout can be seen when running mdadm
> -D command. It's the reason that mdadm doesn't set MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT for
> raid0 with one zone. Then in kernel space, super_1_validate sets mddev->layout
> to -1 because of no MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT. In fact, in raid0 io path, it
> uses the default layout. Set raid0_need_layout to true if
> kernel_version<=v5.4.
> 
> Fixes: 329dfc28debb ('Create: add support for RAID0 layouts.')
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
> ---

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com>

Thanks,
Mariusz

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V3 1/1] mdadm/super1: Add MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT if kernel>=5.4
  2023-10-17 14:12 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
@ 2023-10-26 21:49   ` Jes Sorensen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jes Sorensen @ 2023-10-26 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mariusz Tkaczyk, Xiao Ni; +Cc: colyli, neilb, linux-raid

On 10/17/23 10:12, Mariusz Tkaczyk wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 20:35:46 +0800
> Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> After and include kernel v5.4, it adds one feature bit
>> MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT. It must need to specify a layout for raid0 with more
>> than one zone. But for raid0 with one zone, in fact it also has a defalut
>> layout.
>>
>> Now for raid0 with one zone, *unknown* layout can be seen when running mdadm
>> -D command. It's the reason that mdadm doesn't set MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT for
>> raid0 with one zone. Then in kernel space, super_1_validate sets mddev->layout
>> to -1 because of no MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT. In fact, in raid0 io path, it
>> uses the default layout. Set raid0_need_layout to true if
>> kernel_version<=v5.4.
>>
>> Fixes: 329dfc28debb ('Create: add support for RAID0 layouts.')
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
>> ---
> 
> LGTM.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@linux.intel.com>

Looks good!

Applied!

Thanks,
Jes



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-26 21:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-10-17 12:35 [PATCH V3 1/1] mdadm/super1: Add MD_FEATURE_RAID0_LAYOUT if kernel>=5.4 Xiao Ni
2023-10-17 14:12 ` Mariusz Tkaczyk
2023-10-26 21:49   ` Jes Sorensen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).