linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.net>
To: Carlos Carvalho <carlos@fisica.ufpr.br>
Cc: Dan Moulding <dan@danm.net>,
	junxiao.bi@oracle.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	regressions@lists.linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 6.7.1: md: raid5 hang and unresponsive system; successfully bisected
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 21:21:50 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240126212150.4b56ae05@nvm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZbMnZnvyIyoWeIro@fisica.ufpr.br>

On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 00:30:46 -0300
Carlos Carvalho <carlos@fisica.ufpr.br> wrote:

> Dan Moulding (dan@danm.net) wrote on Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 05:31:30PM -03:
> > I then created an ext4 file system on the "data" volume, mounted it, and used
> > "dd" to copy 1MiB blocks from /dev/urandom to a file on the "data" file
> > system, and just let it run. Eventually "dd" hangs and top shows that
> > md0_raid5 is using 100% CPU.
> 
> It's known that ext4 has these symptoms with parity raid. To make sure it's a
> raid problem you should try another filesystem or remount it with stripe=0.

If Ext4 wouldn't work properly on parity RAID, then it is a bug that should be
tracked down and fixed, not worked around by using a different FS. I am in
disbelief you are seriously suggesting that, and to be honest really doubt
there is any such high-profile "known" issue that stays unfixed and is just
commonly worked around.

-- 
With respect,
Roman

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-26 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-23  0:56 [REGRESSION] 6.7.1: md: raid5 hang and unresponsive system; successfully bisected Dan Moulding
2024-01-23  1:08 ` Song Liu
2024-01-23  1:35 ` Dan Moulding
2024-01-23  6:35   ` Song Liu
2024-01-23 21:53     ` Dan Moulding
2024-01-23 22:21       ` Song Liu
2024-01-23 23:58         ` Dan Moulding
2024-01-25  0:01           ` Song Liu
2024-01-25 16:44             ` junxiao.bi
2024-01-25 19:40               ` Song Liu
2024-01-25 20:31               ` Dan Moulding
2024-01-26  3:30                 ` Carlos Carvalho
2024-01-26 15:46                   ` Dan Moulding
2024-01-30 16:26                     ` Blazej Kucman
2024-01-30 20:21                       ` Song Liu
2024-01-31  1:26                       ` Song Liu
2024-01-31  2:13                         ` Yu Kuai
2024-01-31  2:41                       ` Yu Kuai
2024-01-31  4:55                         ` Song Liu
2024-01-31 13:36                           ` Blazej Kucman
2024-02-01  1:39                             ` Yu Kuai
2024-01-26 16:21                   ` Roman Mamedov [this message]
2024-01-31 17:37                 ` junxiao.bi
2024-02-06  8:07                 ` Song Liu
2024-02-06 20:56                   ` Dan Moulding
2024-02-06 21:34                     ` Song Liu
2024-02-20 23:06 ` Dan Moulding
2024-02-20 23:15   ` junxiao.bi
2024-02-21 14:50     ` Mateusz Kusiak
2024-02-21 19:15       ` junxiao.bi
2024-02-23 17:44     ` Dan Moulding
2024-02-23 19:18       ` junxiao.bi
2024-02-23 20:22         ` Dan Moulding
2024-02-23  8:07   ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-02-24  2:13     ` Song Liu
2024-03-01 20:26       ` junxiao.bi
2024-03-01 23:12         ` Dan Moulding
2024-03-02  0:05           ` Song Liu
2024-03-06  8:38             ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-03-06 17:13               ` Song Liu
2024-03-02 16:55         ` Dan Moulding
2024-03-07  3:34         ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-08 23:49         ` junxiao.bi
2024-03-10  5:13           ` Dan Moulding
2024-03-11  1:50           ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-12 22:56             ` junxiao.bi
2024-03-13  1:20               ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-14 18:20                 ` junxiao.bi
2024-03-14 22:36                   ` Song Liu
2024-03-15  1:30                   ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-14 16:12             ` Dan Moulding
2024-03-15  1:17               ` Yu Kuai
2024-03-19 14:16                 ` Dan Moulding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240126212150.4b56ae05@nvm \
    --to=rm@romanrm.net \
    --cc=carlos@fisica.ufpr.br \
    --cc=dan@danm.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=junxiao.bi@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).