From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp161.vfemail.net (smtp161.vfemail.net [146.59.185.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC40145954 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 05:21:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=146.59.185.161 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706505697; cv=none; b=KbsXCZILenqd7CxpHs8hYRrriJXnC7DI3r7T41abaML2UZw1b6EGZ09HOejHdIjtV2zwOtCd6/miBVcXDSpQiFV9ESfl24bpLWdpErw7Af5k6nToVKCSxDUQ+MzKbclL70IFArecTt+1U9wqauYusdF4j1Vm6Q3DZwSU4wfkyfU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706505697; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SXfHU0FYlnOkSohPLdf20zVevYWWeI9IVj+8NSu1UJY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=J6qXPRs0O9xc5BOiEAbSIHjsig1hLlcIDuBLTUkPrg2VahdRd1nC//zr30IejimS1aNDYvlVRhdDHyagPvOK16wuh0YXgR3vO+M0BXywRN/7nDAABnrPHlh1bKWhgDyeleqlfPlEbwg0ZMQ+LB7xi0sXoZ48Ybd5ZWnuxKmW8UA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=vfemail.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=vfemail.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=vfemail.net header.i=@vfemail.net header.b=SZWwTFiT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=146.59.185.161 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=vfemail.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=vfemail.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=vfemail.net header.i=@vfemail.net header.b="SZWwTFiT" Received: (qmail 20860 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2024 05:21:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO nl101-3.vfemail.net) () by smtpout.vfemail.net with ESMTPS (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted); 29 Jan 2024 05:21:28 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=vfemail.net; h=date:from :to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=2018; bh=SXfHU0FYlnOkSohPLdf20zVev YWWeI9IVj+8NSu1UJY=; b=SZWwTFiTVSfSXiw95mUIZzoHtonQvt9Aa3oDdeo2P vd28Ag3vr2vRWx7pC8cqFeJ82wD6pBy2E38HOZl7YQnYcA8OOcwhkWbJtIQ5HVnj By0wmpVc8jl1yf7lzvClMkoKTxAI9O9n4qQFrYj2iubCX3PEUTX1hsK8mqbaDKIF 74= Received: (qmail 72881 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2024 05:21:27 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 72866, pid: 72878, t: 0.3519s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO bmwxMDEudmZlbWFpbC5uZXQ=) (aGdudGt3aXNAdmZlbWFpbC5uZXQ=@MTkyLjE2OC4xLjE5Mg==) by nl101.vfemail.net with ESMTPA; 29 Jan 2024 05:21:27 -0000 Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 00:21:24 -0500 From: David Niklas To: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" Subject: And then they sent my defective CPU back to me... Message-ID: <20240129002124.36e1a1b5@firefly> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, ### Background (for the curious.) Much like the rest of you, I have a RAID array on my PC. I've just come out of the tail end of a PC repair nightmare where you send your parts in for warranty and they're still broken when you get them back. During this trying process of testing my array "decided" to resync itself. I tried to idle it, but that failed. Granted, I might have copied the data I wanted off of it, but I didn't think about it at the time and it was the array which seemed to really trigger the bug. The problem I was seeing was silent data corruption. I've done some tests, and the system seems stable now that I've replaced my CPU, but I can't prove it as this bug has a history of being hard to detect. And how did I find it? I was running a check of my array before backing up my data to cold storage... My PC kept crashing. I then replaced, unplugged, or warrantied out each and every part. But the bug was still there. Thus I purchased some a new CPU, lower performance CPU, and an identical MB, which were the only parts I didn't have spares for. And then ata12 decided to act up... so that's one drive I probably have to warranty... And then when booting fsck "decided" to fix the file system... which would ordinarily be mounted ro as I knew I had problems. I killed fsck as fast as I could. ### end background As things stand, I have an array which has some errors in it. Like 100 reports of mismatches worth of errors. It's a RAID 60 array. Why 60? Because I had read that only 4 drives could be used in a RAID 6 array in my CompTIA book and my drives are over 6TB so RAID 5 won't work right. I'm beginning to suspect that limitation doesn't exist for md raid. Now last time I had a problem with mismatched sectors, I used this article here to help me find the affected files: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/730307/find-files-contained-in-sector-of-a-raid-array Last time, I could easily replace the affected files. So I just resynced. Then, out of curiosity, I compared the originals to the damaged ones and they were identical. So, is the above answer the way to find damaged files? Is there a way to isolate the array so that I can see the different "versions", if you will, of the affected files/file system? Thanks, David