From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 828C64C62A for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 07:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713770648; cv=none; b=WFMXLLG+sR6DvA8GD4Kx8pFTb4NtFqSrRcdXcsqNJ0FVYDOblIiikKZjvhi7ZgyAlKMnRFbZGy192FOf1BbXCvaOyuLC8XmWYXhOIqV2Ct0Z+G50BoEKyo9l3Spv4Ak3UaNMLHvMDcGNoHK8gbBKqjibw7KztQUrg26NgmMo73Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713770648; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+P3WWNrvRnEL5/pwY55+tQ5VidnVNf+Asf+RLdLx4JU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FiiTTeMDvhgOnU68OP6oFl0dXKHWjT1ckrawIFzoArycyapFnlBrvdubd1fsNSc+ot6fgLUxFVGTfMlYGAJkKDkEP3DhNbYeRJix/QpJwXPm/hGcPh+Vw41sJvKp9ZXRKZRlCGAqSeUeYk/wzjyEgbLSHNfd4h+UvYkqZm7QUIU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hB8Nqa2j; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hB8Nqa2j" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1713770646; x=1745306646; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+P3WWNrvRnEL5/pwY55+tQ5VidnVNf+Asf+RLdLx4JU=; b=hB8Nqa2jZPNBYv8k7FU8p4u1Jmv3AyjC48xI4vWcmvxgj93Hxq1bQQ5J woP5kbCrI13vXfwvFdM+UD9jEr5TeCcqlDM66/EQ7+NYVJu1MOvYZWGzS HiYU5JvU3UP74YudQD3OPTEDv3T9NvmQ5rfvFpzzzyRe3Bdu/knC6x8+M LjbBA5P9JjGHDKaBAJdet3xE/gLg4e8NJET5Ur95W5bqkdrJ3v2z86Gtm n2mP45plPprwwKQSVU4DCCY3MseqRXw0NwKhR/5uPFaKVzh5RssGzc7ai RzqjyQDYDNq8ZdhLSv8FuKaRO7QqI7K3Fke2J8lh0PDFaIueni367U35y w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 55wor/QXQsiSMRhE0mRtsQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Au+p5wWOQeaXt9Nqgp9aZQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11051"; a="12233667" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,220,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="12233667" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Apr 2024 00:24:06 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5eEUFqb+R9i3wtkJtz0o7A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: FUmEGBLlSu+joZVYuJUWtQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,220,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="24531714" Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([10.237.142.95]) by orviesa008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Apr 2024 00:24:03 -0700 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 09:23:58 +0200 From: Mariusz Tkaczyk To: Xiao Ni Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, jes@trained-monkey.org, song@kernel.org, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com, ncroxon@redhat.com, colyli@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] tests/00createnames enhance Message-ID: <20240422092358.00002736@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20240418102321.95384-1-xni@redhat.com> <20240418102321.95384-3-xni@redhat.com> <20240419092021.00003bc1@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:56:17 +0800 Xiao Ni wrote: > > > > What about adding empty mdadm config to the command `-c > > ./mdadm_empty.conf`? I see it as the best option for now. That save use > > from checking 2 config locations and any user defined behaviors. Do you see > > any disadvantages? > > You mean specifying config file in test case when creating raid? Yes, with that default config won't be read. Mariusz