From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from shin.romanrm.net (shin.romanrm.net [146.185.199.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F14DD389 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 22:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=146.185.199.61 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714343731; cv=none; b=hl5iBajfWsiCpVyiABvqdvEUvA+PdgFcJ15/OY3GjhcAJiufOywJwBEPtu+iHaHeKX2iXuc2+bh6J+2/3UAERNLl6kJ+U89fkhIox0wvhEgZDbfsJ83/svnU3A6CiieKAL9+Of6RlgGEpds4GSTuGoBb0zTkh3Fe6CepISeg5Bc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1714343731; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MfduCKVmDvFwfUxVW/A/9qAweEzHm/8vjLTBc+R/Da8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QvJgRq49gnsujAymYQ0iDFlPFHG61noJa/L/6kCTdplKeYibxpsj0TSJfWXE8kEtiES4tQ0Cn6x+U6h0Qza58MfUSgvlftFTXU+oz9maU16l3ch450hSx61UusECs6cZlWDY2jDZAZSMu5k5wWsQY0wBiY7yqpM7Pszwz+nStkc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=romanrm.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=romanrm.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=146.185.199.61 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=romanrm.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=romanrm.net Received: from nvm (unknown [IPv6:fd39::4a:3cff:fe57:d6b5]) by shin.romanrm.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4728F3F272; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 22:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 03:25:29 +0500 From: Roman Mamedov To: Colgate Minuette Cc: Paul E Luse , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: General Protection Fault in md raid10 Message-ID: <20240429032529.2281222d@nvm> In-Reply-To: <2322142.ElGaqSPkdT@sparkler> References: <8365123.T7Z3S40VBb@sparkler> <4914495.31r3eYUQgx@sparkler> <20240427112219.1bf00101@peluse-desk5> <2322142.ElGaqSPkdT@sparkler> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:16:27 -0700 Colgate Minuette wrote: > I just tried RAID10 on the same HBA/cables with 4 seagate 4TB SAS HDDs, and it > is functioning correctly. Syncing correctly and able to write/read from the md > device. With those 15 TB SSDs, maybe something wonky with the large size? Did you try creating a smaller partition on each, maybe just start with 4, to not redo all of them, since you say 4 also repros the issue. Test with a 4 TB or even 1TB partitions as RAID members. -- With respect, Roman