From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04F1F433A6 for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 08:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715157342; cv=none; b=cmUsfxTbqIFObf7hKGWinitmcMu7ufgbmxIBVxI0PINnIbG6j0qDlYyd6LrKzpCyQeAf3qi+TSyL4GZ2dI+eQ4Y1zlTgGmpJ+cg7e4DcgePnqrSkkoXXPi5b+PU3XqA66aV44rhbsUfYe7DE/f+slEc5JREDQqVAUYNNu0bIBkM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715157342; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pXYAjRAa5VDatJxHVS1eX59zONm/j4pIXP/ArGnp8pw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bYVqls42lj3unagihLCFpS+AoTNGJcbG0UBkQmLO2I1Lvnsx4pUYMFH1e/zRu/sJwzc+c7ujoWQFnreRtmpFwqT375QK8KQZMJOEB37moRskH3b0jP8FkV+IsuFF1MN+vuJi08rsLY5EjCU0xS+y1cHS2NVWrePL3VIhetXR6mE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=WS0McjKO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="WS0McjKO" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1715157341; x=1746693341; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pXYAjRAa5VDatJxHVS1eX59zONm/j4pIXP/ArGnp8pw=; b=WS0McjKO4xmh6NuB70vfVr8igJsS3BXTdQ7QcXOEPsK691HWeidldAQU cJeSmCtvFTo2fybpShAU8oWZc7Aiy7sWKArKJlbrTste5LGIUI7m2/NG1 vJldUAs0hDbvmHLLAVSHBqG+TsYDeWmx+OtMMkJEPtTI5oAY62uUKaIKr 82DsnEjXZv6WPjNEMWngLNgc61/guxLuH0F7gH8ILQTwvUIK1zBpZgnff yjXXgxm1lgdkewL1jUTqpsK0yPwunvWlWlvWQoO+u9BLiyZpCnWDKsyxF ObZPijWcj3kMGPCLl3xBEFs3ReCPTZbdRJfeFk6CNC9M0IPqTof8XGyBv Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: xqklKVxpT3qkUvzfjEqUOg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: IQqmwrY+Sm2zJ2bG+08kQg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11066"; a="11132919" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,144,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="11132919" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2024 01:35:40 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 6d4X5lBLT2eaiVIaoulOdw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 2c7HafttRlKLqbmtZUK4iQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,144,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="33293879" Received: from mtkaczyk-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.246.29.120]) by fmviesa005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 May 2024 01:35:38 -0700 Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 10:35:33 +0200 From: Mariusz Tkaczyk To: Xiao Ni Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, jes@trained-monkey.org, song@kernel.org, yukuai1@huaweicloud.com, ncroxon@redhat.com, colyli@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] tests/01r5fail enhance Message-ID: <20240508103533.0000681a@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20240418102321.95384-4-xni@redhat.com> References: <20240418102321.95384-1-xni@redhat.com> <20240418102321.95384-4-xni@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:23:19 +0800 Xiao Ni wrote: > After removing dev0, the recovery starts because it already has a spare > disk. It's good to check recovery. But it's not right to check recovery > after adding dev3. Because the recovery may finish. It depends on the > recovery performance of the testing machine. If the recovery finishes, > it will fail. But dev3 is only added as a spare disk, we can't expect > there is a recovery happens. > > So remove the codes about adding dev3. > > Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni > --- Applying this one! Thanks, Mariusz