From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Kanchan Joshi <joshiiitr@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] block: remove the blk_integrity_profile structure
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:49:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240606044906.GB8395@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+1E3rJn3uNfkoFtm_am9qwQmwWvhu3nPVMaM63AJ2GBdxZTmQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 08:05:20PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 12:01???PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote:
> > @@ -446,13 +446,14 @@ bool bio_integrity_prep(struct bio *bio)
> > if (bio_integrity(bio))
> > return true;
> >
> > + if (!bi->csum_type)
> > + return true;
>
> Changes look mostly good, but trigger a behavior change for non-PI
> metadata format.
>
> Earlier nop profile was registered for that case. And the block-layer
> continued to attach an appropriately sized meta buffer to incoming IO, even
> though it did not generate/verify. Hence, IOs don't fail.
>
> Now also we show that the nop profile is set, but the above
> "csum_type" check ensures that
> meta buffer is not attached and REQ_INTEGRITY is not set in the bio.
> NVMe will start failing IOs with BLK_STS_NOTSUPP now [*].
Yes. I didn't remember that odd case and failed to test it, but I can
trivially reproduce it now.
Which brings up another issue: bio_integrity_prep allocates the metadata
buffer using kmalloc, so we'll leak write random kernel memory to the
devices for this case which is ... not good. I guess for stable fixes
and backports I'll add a real generate_fn that just zeroes all the
memory for now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-06 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-05 6:28 move integrity settings to queue_limits Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 01/12] dm-integrity: use the nop integrity profile Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 14:52 ` Milan Broz
2024-06-06 4:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-06 0:12 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 02/12] block: remove the unused BIP_{CTRL,DISK}_NOCHECK flags Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-05 23:31 ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-06-06 0:13 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 03/12] block: remove the BIP_IP_CHECKSUM flag Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-05 23:31 ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-06-06 0:14 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 04/12] block: remove the blk_integrity_profile structure Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 14:35 ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-06-06 4:49 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-06-05 16:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-06 4:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-06 15:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 05/12] block: remove the blk_flush_integrity call in blk_integrity_unregister Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 06/12] block: factor out flag_{store,show} helper for integrity Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:00 ` Keith Busch
2024-06-06 0:16 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 07/12] block: use kstrtoul in flag_store Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:00 ` Keith Busch
2024-06-06 0:16 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 08/12] block: don't pretend to generate/verify for non-PI metadata Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 09/12] block: don't require stable pages " Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 10/12] block: bypass the STABLE_WRITES flag for protection information Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 11/12] block: invert the BLK_INTEGRITY_{GENERATE,VERIFY} flags Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-06 0:20 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 12/12] block: move integrity information into queue_limits Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-06 4:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240606044906.GB8395@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=joshiiitr@gmail.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).