From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] block: remove the blk_integrity_profile structure
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 06:50:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240606045048.GC8395@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fee6338e-4aae-456c-90a3-228a19fae58a@acm.org>
On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 10:31:27AM -0600, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> + case BLK_INTEGRITY_CSUM_CRC64:
>> + if (bi->flags & BLK_INTEGRITY_REF_TAG)
>> + return "EXT-DIF-TYPE1-CRC64";
>> + return "EXT-DIF-TYPE3-CRC64";
>> + default:
>> + return "nop";
>> + }
>> +}
>
> Since bi->csum_type has an enumeration type, please leave out the "default:"
> and move return "nop" outside the switch statement. This will make the
> compiler issue a warning if a new enumeration label would be added without
> updating the above switch statement. Otherwise this patch looks good to me.
For that to work you'd need to make csum_type the enum type and not an
unsigned char, which would bloat the block limits. You'd also need to
keep the return "nop" where it is, but use the explicit case instead of
the default.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-06 4:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-05 6:28 move integrity settings to queue_limits Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 01/12] dm-integrity: use the nop integrity profile Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 14:52 ` Milan Broz
2024-06-06 4:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-06 0:12 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 02/12] block: remove the unused BIP_{CTRL,DISK}_NOCHECK flags Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-05 23:31 ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-06-06 0:13 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 03/12] block: remove the BIP_IP_CHECKSUM flag Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:21 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-05 23:31 ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-06-06 0:14 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 04/12] block: remove the blk_integrity_profile structure Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 14:35 ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-06-06 4:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-06 4:50 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-06-06 15:38 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 05/12] block: remove the blk_flush_integrity call in blk_integrity_unregister Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 06/12] block: factor out flag_{store,show} helper for integrity Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:00 ` Keith Busch
2024-06-06 0:16 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 07/12] block: use kstrtoul in flag_store Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:00 ` Keith Busch
2024-06-06 0:16 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 08/12] block: don't pretend to generate/verify for non-PI metadata Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 09/12] block: don't require stable pages " Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 10/12] block: bypass the STABLE_WRITES flag for protection information Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 11/12] block: invert the BLK_INTEGRITY_{GENERATE,VERIFY} flags Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-06 0:20 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2024-06-05 6:28 ` [PATCH 12/12] block: move integrity information into queue_limits Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-05 16:56 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-06-06 4:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240606045048.GC8395@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).