From: Paul E Luse <paul.e.luse@linux.intel.com>
To: Shushu Yi <teddyxym@outlook.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Shushu Yi <firnyee@gmail.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>,
hch@infradead.org, Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC V5] md/raid5: optimize Scattered Address Space and Thread-Level Parallelism to improve RAID5 performance
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 06:43:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240608064356.508c0cf5@peluse-desk5> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240605100327.7c64312f@peluse-desk5>
On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 10:03:27 -0700
Paul E Luse <paul.e.luse@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 00:53:42 +0800
> Shushu Yi <teddyxym@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Awesome thanks! FYi for everyone on V4 I ran both data integrity (no
> issues) and perf tests and performance looked compelling. I'm
> re-running the baseline now (as I had to skip one patch because of the
> conflict), once that's done tomrorow I will re-run V5 and publish
> resutls for everyone.
>
> -Paul
Performance results look very good. Christoph I know you showed
interest in V1 of this patch, I'm think these numbers might peak your
interest again.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/5v2bWeYBsKWu6FHA8
>
> > Optimize scattered address space. Achieves significant improvements
> > in both throughput and latency.
> >
> > Maximize thread-level parallelism and reduce CPU suspension time
> > caused by lock contention. Achieve increased overall storage
> > throughput by 89.4% and decrease the 99.99th percentile I/O latency
> > by 85.4% on a system with four PCIe 4.0 SSDs. (Set the iodepth to 32
> > and employ libaio. Configure the I/O size as 4 KB with sequential
> > write and 16 threads. In RAID5 consist of 2+1 1TB Samsung 980Pro
> > SSDs, throughput went from 5218MB/s to 9884MB/s.)
> >
> > Note: Publish this work as a paper and provide the URL
> > (https://www.hotstorage.org/2022/camera-ready/hotstorage22-5/pdf/
> > hotstorage22-5.pdf).
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Yiming Xu <teddyxym@outlook.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yiming Xu <teddyxym@outlook.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shushu Yi <firnyee@gmail.com>
> > Tested-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
> > ---
> > V1 -> V2: Cleaned up coding style and divided into 2 patches
> > (HemiRAID and ScalaRAID corresponding to the paper mentioned
> > above). ScalaRAID equipped every counter with a counter lock and
> > employ our D-Block. HemiRAID increased the number of stripe locks
> > to 128 V2 -> V3: Adjusted the language used in the subject and
> > changelog. Since patch 1/2 in V2 cannot be used independently and
> > does not encompass all of our work, it has been merged into a
> > single patch. V3 -> V4: Fixed incorrect sending address and
> > changelog format. V4 -> V5: Resolved a adress conflict on main
> > (commit f0e729af2eb6bee9eb58c4df1087f14ebaefe26b (HEAD -> md-6.10,
> > tag: md-6.10-20240502, origin/md-6.10)).
> >
> > drivers/md/md-bitmap.c | 197
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- drivers/md/md-bitmap.h |
> > 12 ++- drivers/md/raid5.h | 7 +-
> > 3 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
> > index 0a2d37eb38ef..f08d3228b305 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
> > @@ -47,10 +47,12 @@ static inline char *bmname(struct bitmap
> > *bitmap)
> > * if we find our page, we increment the page's refcount so that it
> > stays
> > * allocated while we're using it
> > */
> > -static int md_bitmap_checkpage(struct bitmap_counts *bitmap,
> > - unsigned long page, int create, int
> > no_hijack) -__releases(bitmap->lock)
> > -__acquires(bitmap->lock)
> > +static int md_bitmap_checkpage(struct bitmap_counts *bitmap,
> > unsigned long page,
> > + int create, int no_hijack,
> > spinlock_t *bmclock, int locktype) +__releases(bmclock)
> > +__acquires(bmclock)
> > +__releases(bitmap->mlock)
> > +__acquires(bitmap->mlock)
> > {
> > unsigned char *mappage;
> >
> > @@ -65,8 +67,10 @@ __acquires(bitmap->lock)
> > return -ENOENT;
> >
> > /* this page has not been allocated yet */
> > -
> > - spin_unlock_irq(&bitmap->lock);
> > + if (locktype)
> > + spin_unlock_irq(bmclock);
> > + else
> > + write_unlock_irq(&bitmap->mlock);
> > /* It is possible that this is being called inside a
> > * prepare_to_wait/finish_wait loop from
> > raid5c:make_request().
> > * In general it is not permitted to sleep in that context
> > as it @@ -81,7 +85,11 @@ __acquires(bitmap->lock)
> > */
> > sched_annotate_sleep();
> > mappage = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_NOIO);
> > - spin_lock_irq(&bitmap->lock);
> > +
> > + if (locktype)
> > + spin_lock_irq(bmclock);
> > + else
> > + write_lock_irq(&bitmap->mlock);
> >
> > if (mappage == NULL) {
> > pr_debug("md/bitmap: map page allocation failed,
> > hijacking\n"); @@ -399,7 +407,7 @@ static int read_file_page(struct
> > file *file, unsigned long index, }
> >
> > wait_event(bitmap->write_wait,
> > - atomic_read(&bitmap->pending_writes)==0);
> > + atomic_read(&bitmap->pending_writes) == 0);
> > if (test_bit(BITMAP_WRITE_ERROR, &bitmap->flags))
> > ret = -EIO;
> > out:
> > @@ -458,7 +466,7 @@ static void md_bitmap_wait_writes(struct bitmap
> > *bitmap) {
> > if (bitmap->storage.file)
> > wait_event(bitmap->write_wait,
> > -
> > atomic_read(&bitmap->pending_writes)==0);
> > + atomic_read(&bitmap->pending_writes) ==
> > 0); else
> > /* Note that we ignore the return value. The
> > writes
> > * might have failed, but that would just mean that
> > @@ -1248,16 +1256,28 @@ void md_bitmap_write_all(struct bitmap
> > *bitmap) static void md_bitmap_count_page(struct bitmap_counts
> > *bitmap, sector_t offset, int inc)
> > {
> > - sector_t chunk = offset >> bitmap->chunkshift;
> > - unsigned long page = chunk >> PAGE_COUNTER_SHIFT;
> > + sector_t blockno = offset >> (PAGE_SHIFT - SECTOR_SHIFT);
> > + sector_t totblocks = bitmap->chunks << (bitmap->chunkshift
> > - (PAGE_SHIFT - SECTOR_SHIFT));
> > + unsigned long bits = totblocks ? fls((totblocks - 1)) : 0;
> > + unsigned long mask = ULONG_MAX << bits | ~(ULONG_MAX <<
> > + (bits - (bitmap->chunkshift
> > + SECTOR_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)));
> > + unsigned long cntid = blockno & mask;
> > + unsigned long page = cntid >> PAGE_COUNTER_SHIFT;
> > +
> > bitmap->bp[page].count += inc;
> > md_bitmap_checkfree(bitmap, page);
> > }
> >
> > static void md_bitmap_set_pending(struct bitmap_counts *bitmap,
> > sector_t offset) {
> > - sector_t chunk = offset >> bitmap->chunkshift;
> > - unsigned long page = chunk >> PAGE_COUNTER_SHIFT;
> > + sector_t blockno = offset >> (PAGE_SHIFT - SECTOR_SHIFT);
> > + sector_t totblocks = bitmap->chunks << (bitmap->chunkshift
> > - (PAGE_SHIFT - SECTOR_SHIFT));
> > + unsigned long bits = totblocks ? fls((totblocks - 1)) : 0;
> > + unsigned long mask = ULONG_MAX << bits | ~(ULONG_MAX <<
> > + (bits - (bitmap->chunkshift
> > + SECTOR_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)));
> > + unsigned long cntid = blockno & mask;
> > + unsigned long page = cntid >> PAGE_COUNTER_SHIFT;
> > +
> > struct bitmap_page *bp = &bitmap->bp[page];
> >
> > if (!bp->pending)
> > @@ -1266,7 +1286,7 @@ static void md_bitmap_set_pending(struct
> > bitmap_counts *bitmap, sector_t offset)
> > static bitmap_counter_t *md_bitmap_get_counter(struct bitmap_counts
> > *bitmap, sector_t offset, sector_t *blocks,
> > - int create);
> > + int create,
> > spinlock_t *bmclock, int locktype);
> > static void mddev_set_timeout(struct mddev *mddev, unsigned long
> > timeout, bool force)
> > @@ -1349,7 +1369,7 @@ void md_bitmap_daemon_work(struct mddev
> > *mddev)
> > * decrement and handle accordingly.
> > */
> > counts = &bitmap->counts;
> > - spin_lock_irq(&counts->lock);
> > + write_lock_irq(&counts->mlock);
> > nextpage = 0;
> > for (j = 0; j < counts->chunks; j++) {
> > bitmap_counter_t *bmc;
> > @@ -1364,7 +1384,7 @@ void md_bitmap_daemon_work(struct mddev
> > *mddev) counts->bp[j >> PAGE_COUNTER_SHIFT].pending
> > = 0; }
> >
> > - bmc = md_bitmap_get_counter(counts, block, &blocks,
> > 0);
> > + bmc = md_bitmap_get_counter(counts, block, &blocks,
> > 0, 0, 0); if (!bmc) {
> > j |= PAGE_COUNTER_MASK;
> > continue;
> > @@ -1380,7 +1400,7 @@ void md_bitmap_daemon_work(struct mddev
> > *mddev) bitmap->allclean = 0;
> > }
> > }
> > - spin_unlock_irq(&counts->lock);
> > + write_unlock_irq(&counts->mlock);
> >
> > md_bitmap_wait_writes(bitmap);
> > /* Now start writeout on any page in NEEDWRITE that isn't
> > DIRTY. @@ -1413,17 +1433,25 @@ void md_bitmap_daemon_work(struct
> > mddev *mddev)
> > static bitmap_counter_t *md_bitmap_get_counter(struct bitmap_counts
> > *bitmap, sector_t offset, sector_t *blocks,
> > - int create)
> > -__releases(bitmap->lock)
> > -__acquires(bitmap->lock)
> > + int create,
> > spinlock_t *bmclock, int locktype) +__releases(bmclock)
> > +__acquires(bmclock)
> > +__releases(bitmap->mlock)
> > +__acquires(bitmap->mlock)
> > {
> > /* If 'create', we might release the lock and reclaim it.
> > * The lock must have been taken with interrupts enabled.
> > * If !create, we don't release the lock.
> > */
> > - sector_t chunk = offset >> bitmap->chunkshift;
> > - unsigned long page = chunk >> PAGE_COUNTER_SHIFT;
> > - unsigned long pageoff = (chunk & PAGE_COUNTER_MASK) <<
> > COUNTER_BYTE_SHIFT;
> > + sector_t blockno = offset >> (PAGE_SHIFT - SECTOR_SHIFT);
> > + sector_t totblocks = bitmap->chunks << (bitmap->chunkshift
> > - (PAGE_SHIFT - SECTOR_SHIFT));
> > + unsigned long bits = totblocks ? fls((totblocks - 1)) : 0;
> > + unsigned long mask = ULONG_MAX << bits | ~(ULONG_MAX <<
> > + (bits - (bitmap->chunkshift
> > + SECTOR_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)));
> > + unsigned long cntid = blockno & mask;
> > + unsigned long page = cntid >> PAGE_COUNTER_SHIFT;
> > + unsigned long pageoff = (cntid & PAGE_COUNTER_MASK) <<
> > COUNTER_BYTE_SHIFT; +
> > sector_t csize = ((sector_t)1) << bitmap->chunkshift;
> > int err;
> >
> > @@ -1436,7 +1464,7 @@ __acquires(bitmap->lock)
> > *blocks = csize - (offset & (csize - 1));
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > - err = md_bitmap_checkpage(bitmap, page, create, 0);
> > + err = md_bitmap_checkpage(bitmap, page, create, 0, bmclock,
> > 1);
> > if (bitmap->bp[page].hijacked ||
> > bitmap->bp[page].map == NULL)
> > @@ -1461,6 +1489,28 @@ __acquires(bitmap->lock)
> > &(bitmap->bp[page].map[pageoff]);
> > }
> >
> > +/* set-association */
> > +static spinlock_t *md_bitmap_get_bmclock(struct bitmap_counts
> > *bitmap, sector_t offset); +
> > +static spinlock_t *md_bitmap_get_bmclock(struct bitmap_counts
> > *bitmap, sector_t offset) +{
> > + sector_t blockno = offset >> (PAGE_SHIFT - SECTOR_SHIFT);
> > + sector_t totblocks = bitmap->chunks << (bitmap->chunkshift
> > - (PAGE_SHIFT - SECTOR_SHIFT));
> > + unsigned long bitscnt = totblocks ? fls((totblocks - 1)) :
> > 0;
> > + unsigned long maskcnt = ULONG_MAX << bitscnt | ~(ULONG_MAX
> > << (bitscnt -
> > + (bitmap->chunkshift +
> > SECTOR_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)));
> > + unsigned long cntid = blockno & maskcnt;
> > +
> > + unsigned long totcnts = bitmap->chunks;
> > + unsigned long bitslock = totcnts ? fls((totcnts - 1)) : 0;
> > + unsigned long masklock = ULONG_MAX << bitslock |
> > ~(ULONG_MAX <<
> > + (bitslock -
> > BITMAP_COUNTER_LOCK_RATIO_SHIFT));
> > + unsigned long lockid = cntid & masklock;
> > +
> > + spinlock_t *bmclock = &(bitmap->bmclocks[lockid]);
> > + return bmclock;
> > +}
> > +
> > int md_bitmap_startwrite(struct bitmap *bitmap, sector_t offset,
> > unsigned long sectors, int behind) {
> > if (!bitmap)
> > @@ -1480,11 +1530,15 @@ int md_bitmap_startwrite(struct bitmap
> > *bitmap, sector_t offset, unsigned long s while (sectors) {
> > sector_t blocks;
> > bitmap_counter_t *bmc;
> > + spinlock_t *bmclock;
> >
> > - spin_lock_irq(&bitmap->counts.lock);
> > - bmc = md_bitmap_get_counter(&bitmap->counts,
> > offset, &blocks, 1);
> > + bmclock = md_bitmap_get_bmclock(&bitmap->counts,
> > offset);
> > + read_lock(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > + spin_lock_irq(bmclock);
> > + bmc = md_bitmap_get_counter(&bitmap->counts,
> > offset, &blocks, 1, bmclock, 1); if (!bmc) {
> > - spin_unlock_irq(&bitmap->counts.lock);
> > + spin_unlock_irq(bmclock);
> > + read_unlock(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1496,7 +1550,8 @@ int md_bitmap_startwrite(struct bitmap
> > *bitmap, sector_t offset, unsigned long s */
> > prepare_to_wait(&bitmap->overflow_wait,
> > &__wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > - spin_unlock_irq(&bitmap->counts.lock);
> > + spin_unlock_irq(bmclock);
> > + read_unlock(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > schedule();
> > finish_wait(&bitmap->overflow_wait,
> > &__wait); continue;
> > @@ -1513,7 +1568,8 @@ int md_bitmap_startwrite(struct bitmap
> > *bitmap, sector_t offset, unsigned long s
> > (*bmc)++;
> >
> > - spin_unlock_irq(&bitmap->counts.lock);
> > + spin_unlock_irq(bmclock);
> > + read_unlock(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> >
> > offset += blocks;
> > if (sectors > blocks)
> > @@ -1542,11 +1598,15 @@ void md_bitmap_endwrite(struct bitmap
> > *bitmap, sector_t offset, sector_t blocks;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > bitmap_counter_t *bmc;
> > + spinlock_t *bmclock;
> >
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&bitmap->counts.lock, flags);
> > - bmc = md_bitmap_get_counter(&bitmap->counts,
> > offset, &blocks, 0);
> > + bmclock = md_bitmap_get_bmclock(&bitmap->counts,
> > offset);
> > + read_lock(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(bmclock, flags);
> > + bmc = md_bitmap_get_counter(&bitmap->counts,
> > offset, &blocks, 0, bmclock, 1); if (!bmc) {
> > -
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bitmap->counts.lock, flags);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(bmclock, flags);
> > + read_unlock(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1568,7 +1628,8 @@ void md_bitmap_endwrite(struct bitmap *bitmap,
> > sector_t offset, md_bitmap_set_pending(&bitmap->counts, offset);
> > bitmap->allclean = 0;
> > }
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bitmap->counts.lock,
> > flags);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(bmclock, flags);
> > + read_unlock(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > offset += blocks;
> > if (sectors > blocks)
> > sectors -= blocks;
> > @@ -1582,13 +1643,16 @@ static int __bitmap_start_sync(struct bitmap
> > *bitmap, sector_t offset, sector_t int degraded)
> > {
> > bitmap_counter_t *bmc;
> > + spinlock_t *bmclock;
> > int rv;
> > if (bitmap == NULL) {/* FIXME or bitmap set as 'failed' */
> > *blocks = 1024;
> > return 1; /* always resync if no bitmap */
> > }
> > - spin_lock_irq(&bitmap->counts.lock);
> > - bmc = md_bitmap_get_counter(&bitmap->counts, offset,
> > blocks, 0);
> > + bmclock = md_bitmap_get_bmclock(&bitmap->counts, offset);
> > + read_lock(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > + spin_lock_irq(bmclock);
> > + bmc = md_bitmap_get_counter(&bitmap->counts, offset,
> > blocks, 0, bmclock, 1); rv = 0;
> > if (bmc) {
> > /* locked */
> > @@ -1602,7 +1666,8 @@ static int __bitmap_start_sync(struct bitmap
> > *bitmap, sector_t offset, sector_t }
> > }
> > }
> > - spin_unlock_irq(&bitmap->counts.lock);
> > + spin_unlock_irq(bmclock);
> > + read_unlock(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > return rv;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1634,13 +1699,16 @@ void md_bitmap_end_sync(struct bitmap
> > *bitmap, sector_t offset, sector_t *blocks {
> > bitmap_counter_t *bmc;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > + spinlock_t *bmclock;
> >
> > if (bitmap == NULL) {
> > *blocks = 1024;
> > return;
> > }
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&bitmap->counts.lock, flags);
> > - bmc = md_bitmap_get_counter(&bitmap->counts, offset,
> > blocks, 0);
> > + bmclock = md_bitmap_get_bmclock(&bitmap->counts, offset);
> > + read_lock(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(bmclock, flags);
> > + bmc = md_bitmap_get_counter(&bitmap->counts, offset,
> > blocks, 0, bmclock, 1); if (bmc == NULL)
> > goto unlock;
> > /* locked */
> > @@ -1657,7 +1725,8 @@ void md_bitmap_end_sync(struct bitmap *bitmap,
> > sector_t offset, sector_t *blocks }
> > }
> > unlock:
> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bitmap->counts.lock, flags);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(bmclock, flags);
> > + read_unlock(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(md_bitmap_end_sync);
> >
> > @@ -1738,10 +1807,15 @@ static void md_bitmap_set_memory_bits(struct
> > bitmap *bitmap, sector_t offset, in
> > sector_t secs;
> > bitmap_counter_t *bmc;
> > - spin_lock_irq(&bitmap->counts.lock);
> > - bmc = md_bitmap_get_counter(&bitmap->counts, offset, &secs,
> > 1);
> > + spinlock_t *bmclock;
> > +
> > + bmclock = md_bitmap_get_bmclock(&bitmap->counts, offset);
> > + read_lock(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > + spin_lock_irq(bmclock);
> > + bmc = md_bitmap_get_counter(&bitmap->counts, offset, &secs,
> > 1, bmclock, 1); if (!bmc) {
> > - spin_unlock_irq(&bitmap->counts.lock);
> > + spin_unlock_irq(bmclock);
> > + read_unlock(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > return;
> > }
> > if (!*bmc) {
> > @@ -1752,7 +1826,8 @@ static void md_bitmap_set_memory_bits(struct
> > bitmap *bitmap, sector_t offset, in }
> > if (needed)
> > *bmc |= NEEDED_MASK;
> > - spin_unlock_irq(&bitmap->counts.lock);
> > + spin_unlock_irq(bmclock);
> > + read_unlock(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > }
> >
> > /* dirty the memory and file bits for bitmap chunks "s" to "e" */
> > @@ -1806,6 +1881,7 @@ void md_bitmap_free(struct bitmap *bitmap)
> > {
> > unsigned long k, pages;
> > struct bitmap_page *bp;
> > + spinlock_t *bmclocks;
> >
> > if (!bitmap) /* there was no bitmap */
> > return;
> > @@ -1826,6 +1902,7 @@ void md_bitmap_free(struct bitmap *bitmap)
> >
> > bp = bitmap->counts.bp;
> > pages = bitmap->counts.pages;
> > + bmclocks = bitmap->counts.bmclocks;
> >
> > /* free all allocated memory */
> >
> > @@ -1834,6 +1911,7 @@ void md_bitmap_free(struct bitmap *bitmap)
> > if (bp[k].map && !bp[k].hijacked)
> > kfree(bp[k].map);
> > kfree(bp);
> > + kfree(bmclocks);
> > kfree(bitmap);
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(md_bitmap_free);
> > @@ -1900,7 +1978,9 @@ struct bitmap *md_bitmap_create(struct mddev
> > *mddev, int slot) if (!bitmap)
> > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >
> > - spin_lock_init(&bitmap->counts.lock);
> > + /* initialize metadata lock */
> > + rwlock_init(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > +
> > atomic_set(&bitmap->pending_writes, 0);
> > init_waitqueue_head(&bitmap->write_wait);
> > init_waitqueue_head(&bitmap->overflow_wait);
> > @@ -2143,6 +2223,8 @@ int md_bitmap_resize(struct bitmap *bitmap,
> > sector_t blocks, int ret = 0;
> > long pages;
> > struct bitmap_page *new_bp;
> > + spinlock_t *new_bmclocks;
> > + int num_bmclocks, i;
> >
> > if (bitmap->storage.file && !init) {
> > pr_info("md: cannot resize file-based bitmap\n");
> > @@ -2211,7 +2293,7 @@ int md_bitmap_resize(struct bitmap *bitmap,
> > sector_t blocks, memcpy(page_address(store.sb_page),
> > page_address(bitmap->storage.sb_page),
> > sizeof(bitmap_super_t));
> > - spin_lock_irq(&bitmap->counts.lock);
> > + write_lock_irq(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> > md_bitmap_file_unmap(&bitmap->storage);
> > bitmap->storage = store;
> >
> > @@ -2227,18 +2309,28 @@ int md_bitmap_resize(struct bitmap *bitmap,
> > sector_t blocks, blocks = min(old_counts.chunks <<
> > old_counts.chunkshift, chunks << chunkshift);
> >
> > + /* initialize bmc locks */
> > + num_bmclocks = DIV_ROUND_UP(chunks,
> > BITMAP_COUNTER_LOCK_RATIO); +
> > + new_bmclocks = kvcalloc(num_bmclocks,
> > sizeof(*new_bmclocks), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + bitmap->counts.bmclocks = new_bmclocks;
> > + for (i = 0; i < num_bmclocks; ++i) {
> > + spinlock_t *bmclock =
> > &(bitmap->counts.bmclocks)[i]; +
> > + spin_lock_init(bmclock);
> > + }
> > +
> > /* For cluster raid, need to pre-allocate bitmap */
> > if (mddev_is_clustered(bitmap->mddev)) {
> > unsigned long page;
> > for (page = 0; page < pages; page++) {
> > - ret = md_bitmap_checkpage(&bitmap->counts,
> > page, 1, 1);
> > + ret = md_bitmap_checkpage(&bitmap->counts,
> > page, 1, 1, 0, 0); if (ret) {
> > unsigned long k;
> >
> > /* deallocate the page memory */
> > - for (k = 0; k < page; k++) {
> > + for (k = 0; k < page; k++)
> > kfree(new_bp[k].map);
> > - }
> > kfree(new_bp);
> >
> > /* restore some fields from
> > old_counts */ @@ -2261,11 +2353,12 @@ int md_bitmap_resize(struct
> > bitmap *bitmap, sector_t blocks, bitmap_counter_t *bmc_old,
> > *bmc_new; int set;
> >
> > - bmc_old = md_bitmap_get_counter(&old_counts, block,
> > &old_blocks, 0);
> > + bmc_old = md_bitmap_get_counter(&old_counts, block,
> > &old_blocks, 0, 0, 0); set = bmc_old && NEEDED(*bmc_old);
> >
> > if (set) {
> > - bmc_new =
> > md_bitmap_get_counter(&bitmap->counts, block, &new_blocks, 1);
> > + bmc_new =
> > md_bitmap_get_counter(&bitmap->counts, block, &new_blocks,
> > +
> > 1, 0, 0); if (bmc_new) {
> > if (*bmc_new == 0) {
> > /* need to set on-disk bits
> > too. */ @@ -2301,7 +2394,7 @@ int md_bitmap_resize(struct bitmap
> > *bitmap, sector_t blocks, int i;
> > while (block < (chunks << chunkshift)) {
> > bitmap_counter_t *bmc;
> > - bmc =
> > md_bitmap_get_counter(&bitmap->counts, block, &new_blocks, 1);
> > + bmc =
> > md_bitmap_get_counter(&bitmap->counts, block, &new_blocks, 1, 0,
> > 0); if (bmc) { /* new space. It needs to be
> > resynced, so
> > * we set NEEDED_MASK.
> > @@ -2317,7 +2410,7 @@ int md_bitmap_resize(struct bitmap *bitmap,
> > sector_t blocks, for (i = 0; i < bitmap->storage.file_pages; i++)
> > set_page_attr(bitmap, i,
> > BITMAP_PAGE_DIRTY); }
> > - spin_unlock_irq(&bitmap->counts.lock);
> > + write_unlock_irq(&bitmap->counts.mlock);
> >
> > if (!init) {
> > md_bitmap_unplug(bitmap);
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h
> > index bb9eb418780a..1b9c36bb73ed 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h
> > +++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.h
> > @@ -2,7 +2,9 @@
> > /*
> > * bitmap.h: Copyright (C) Peter T. Breuer (ptb@ot.uc3m.es) 2003
> > *
> > - * additions: Copyright (C) 2003-2004, Paul Clements, SteelEye
> > Technology, Inc.
> > + * additions:
> > + * Copyright (C) 2003-2004, Paul Clements, SteelEye
> > Technology, Inc.
> > + * Copyright (C) 2022-2023, Shushu Yi
> > (firnyee@gmail.com) */
> > #ifndef BITMAP_H
> > #define BITMAP_H 1
> > @@ -103,6 +105,9 @@ typedef __u16 bitmap_counter_t;
> > #define PAGE_COUNTER_MASK (PAGE_COUNTER_RATIO - 1)
> >
> > #define BITMAP_BLOCK_SHIFT 9
> > +/* how many counters share the same bmclock? */
> > +#define BITMAP_COUNTER_LOCK_RATIO_SHIFT 0
> > +#define BITMAP_COUNTER_LOCK_RATIO (1 <<
> > BITMAP_COUNTER_LOCK_RATIO_SHIFT)
> > #endif
> >
> > @@ -116,7 +121,7 @@ typedef __u16 bitmap_counter_t;
> > enum bitmap_state {
> > BITMAP_STALE = 1, /* the bitmap file is out of
> > date or had -EIO */ BITMAP_WRITE_ERROR = 2, /* A write error has
> > occurred */
> > - BITMAP_HOSTENDIAN =15,
> > + BITMAP_HOSTENDIAN = 15,
> > };
> >
> > /* the superblock at the front of the bitmap file -- little endian
> > */ @@ -180,7 +185,8 @@ struct bitmap_page {
> > struct bitmap {
> >
> > struct bitmap_counts {
> > - spinlock_t lock;
> > + rwlock_t mlock; /*
> > lock for metadata */
> > + spinlock_t *bmclocks; /* locks for
> > bmc */ struct bitmap_page *bp;
> > unsigned long pages; /* total number
> > of pages
> > * in the bitmap */
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.h b/drivers/md/raid5.h
> > index 9b5a7dc3f2a0..818ce86f4b2c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/raid5.h
> > +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.h
> > @@ -496,12 +496,7 @@ struct disk_info {
> > #define HASH_MASK (NR_HASH - 1)
> > #define MAX_STRIPE_BATCH 8
> >
> > -/* NOTE NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS must remain below 64.
> > - * This is because we sometimes take all the spinlocks
> > - * and creating that much locking depth can cause
> > - * problems.
> > - */
I'm no expert in this code but I assume it is the case that the reduced
lock contention is the reason this is no longer a concern? How did you
come up with the number 128?
> > -#define NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS 8
> > +#define NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS 128
> > #define STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS_MASK (NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS - 1)
> >
> > struct r5worker {
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-08 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-05 16:53 [RFC V5] md/raid5: optimize Scattered Address Space and Thread-Level Parallelism to improve RAID5 performance Shushu Yi
2024-06-05 17:03 ` Paul E Luse
2024-06-08 13:43 ` Paul E Luse [this message]
2024-06-11 11:59 ` Yu Kuai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240608064356.508c0cf5@peluse-desk5 \
--to=paul.e.luse@linux.intel.com \
--cc=firnyee@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.e.luse@intel.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=teddyxym@outlook.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).