From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, song@kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com,
kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/4] block: Add BLK_FEAT_ATOMIC_WRITES flag
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:16:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240912131610.GB29641@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240903150748.2179966-3-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static void blk_validate_atomic_write_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
> {
> unsigned int boundary_sectors;
>
> - if (!lim->atomic_write_hw_max)
> + if (!(lim->features & BLK_FEAT_ATOMIC_WRITES) || !lim->atomic_write_hw_max)
Overly long line here.
Otherwise this looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-12 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-03 15:07 [PATCH RFC 0/4] RAID0 atomic write support John Garry
2024-09-03 15:07 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] block: Make bdev_can_atomic_write() robust against mis-aligned bdev size John Garry
2024-09-12 13:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-12 14:58 ` John Garry
2024-09-12 15:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-12 15:22 ` John Garry
2024-09-13 8:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-09-03 15:07 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] block: Add BLK_FEAT_ATOMIC_WRITES flag John Garry
2024-09-12 13:16 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-09-12 14:58 ` John Garry
2024-09-03 15:07 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] block: Support atomic writes limits for stacked devices John Garry
2024-09-12 13:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-12 15:05 ` John Garry
2024-09-03 15:07 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] md/raid0: Atomic write support John Garry
2024-09-12 13:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-12 14:48 ` John Garry
2024-09-12 15:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-12 15:38 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240912131610.GB29641@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).