From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 091C51F947; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 12:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729256213; cv=none; b=k7jRu+OE3rorQJK+zVrsP/tD0bi4nuBfJgBA76nzCJGwgqaLLJWnVRGzFEVckIqw7p1YUQHc+V4FCTeytsnXkninlavcClT/L9SkQkY3qkoNd5Yi314aWUSfhuw4QhRZjm7o5950KSFjPieKsxwo2PDsjSkR3aOgjDuMDHv4C3E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729256213; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DxqYJ/nTng3w2f1t+3UAEknjhB6pQTrD7nwB3Lljcz0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=r2q4283l/vwJKRmcd5trk/w0tbG6bKIwM3dgRv875xpZAKopqwltIIsPm3Vy/ZN/osKUFe8b4wb4wDrTZtmzMOeC7E9yKf9rVH79O1QURJ6ZlV4OOwepey5Mz2v0VG1gAntD5Zo2fjG7lWLDbJgkBHhonNiSQtYFaxS/L2h7jk8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=jz8TlxkF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="jz8TlxkF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1729256212; x=1760792212; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DxqYJ/nTng3w2f1t+3UAEknjhB6pQTrD7nwB3Lljcz0=; b=jz8TlxkFVQooT1b6nhokYPffexhUJb0wLu554Hu9v2c0Z9MKqGwFk5j0 SrgMjqsx2hHNBFBnm4YcsDa+R6XEfPAzjC2ZvMxOXINY+Ewny8p84+kSJ Of5hwO+u6+uT7bQZ+MbeyXtqGQruPteDRNu+G7h7G4We2i4sc0NcvJ4bb vpoar9LossEWjUpVclpK+iucT0u0pnDlvcsjsA9f1PGP35gUzgWDHW+2/ v5FpLi4MerBZlsZIO1gyrxGKYAXIPgYnf8y3O6lwH30l4YZGOmFoj0XQ+ RsCznk6+Tu2rK3LPB8nL4Ur3BXVx/wRK6Ze3NPT2l1Yr2o4cELOs3DUHf A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: BdQPLZMDQGKzteZP1PcBqQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OqgJy87DTKiqNZS2Iq0bLA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11229"; a="39412685" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,213,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="39412685" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Oct 2024 05:56:51 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: S0ik5VSmSfG9J8KkcsPGvg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: PcQ7Ih13RrWYT7YC6SgkXg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,213,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="79283539" Received: from mtkaczyk-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.82.157]) by orviesa007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Oct 2024 05:56:49 -0700 Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 14:56:43 +0200 From: Mariusz Tkaczyk To: Song Liu Cc: Yu Kuai , mariusz.tkaczyk@intel.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] md: enhance faulty checking for blocked handling Message-ID: <20241018145643.0000788f@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20241011011630.2002803-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.0 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 23:46:58 -0700 Song Liu wrote: > Mariusz, you have run some tests on v1, but didn't give your > Tested-by tag. Would you mind rerun the test and reply with > the tag? > > Thanks, > Song Hi Song, I see no functional difference between v1 and v2 feel free to add it. I will be hard to rerun these tests right now. Tested-by: Mariusz Tkaczyk Thanks, Mariusz