Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	agk@redhat.com, snitzer@kernel.org, mpatocka@redhat.com,
	song@kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com, nilay@linux.ibm.com,
	axboe@kernel.dk, cem@kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] block/md/dm: set chunk_sectors from stacked dev stripe size
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 12:46:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250714104615.GA30407@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <706d13cf-d0e2-4c30-8943-2c719f9be083@oracle.com>

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 08:52:39AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 14/07/2025 06:53, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Now we should be able to implement the software atomic writes pretty
>> easily for zoned XFS, and funnily they might actually be slightly faster
>> than normal writes due to the transaction batching.  Now that we're
>> getting reasonable test coverage we should be able to give it a spin, but
>> I have a few too many things on my plate at the moment.
>
> Isn't reflink currently incompatible with zoned xfs?

reflink itself yes due to the garbage collection algorithm that is not
reflink aware.  But all I/O on zoned file RT device uses the same I/O
path design as writes that unshare reflinks because it always has to
write out of place.


      reply	other threads:[~2025-07-14 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-11  8:09 [PATCH v6 0/6] block/md/dm: set chunk_sectors from stacked dev stripe size John Garry
2025-07-11  8:09 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] ilog2: add max_pow_of_two_factor() John Garry
2025-07-11  8:09 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] block: sanitize chunk_sectors for atomic write limits John Garry
2025-07-11  8:42   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-11  9:22     ` John Garry
2025-07-11  8:09 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] md/raid0: set chunk_sectors limit John Garry
2025-07-11  8:09 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] md/raid10: " John Garry
2025-07-11  8:09 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] dm-stripe: limit chunk_sectors to the stripe size John Garry
2025-07-11  8:09 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] block: use chunk_sectors when evaluating stacked atomic write limits John Garry
2025-07-11  8:44 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] block/md/dm: set chunk_sectors from stacked dev stripe size Damien Le Moal
2025-07-11  9:16   ` John Garry
2025-07-14  5:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-14  6:00     ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-14  6:13       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-15 15:45         ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-14  7:52     ` John Garry
2025-07-14 10:46       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250714104615.GA30407@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox