From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 350EF2EB86C; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 19:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770405772; cv=none; b=fDuN7XtAwiHgQSqSFYadmw951IZr2gHxc6p7csMlCJHAlXvAlL1SvK0FhTvxewp/HtFtb9zmpwlFKBpGHJz0TMMO3PdLtapZzokv5N6eoxbRiGXWulq3PrfUA77L/lsAxwNvAYW2F7WCfOoI5Cv5+rxbhUHPWltBFGhqNz1HSwk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770405772; c=relaxed/simple; bh=llPkVaxCJEYAFDVjbKmaczSFyKpG35yasKcIaXAYMTU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=r7DTWTAGp/c14K9hUs/EF0wsK/RnC7bwilsgbuSVfmPp0RgnmRIbdkz4KbiWfiQD3Us/bXtsv38sjm1QqYG92FMAmxiB8oV3iGdXPUuCwA9TYnftAp2dJpzQF3LhNxaThmXOgFCwa/UbX7nUXWVhS7pukAIE1KqpIJSDL22/YSc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=H36ehHBK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="H36ehHBK" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770405772; x=1801941772; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=llPkVaxCJEYAFDVjbKmaczSFyKpG35yasKcIaXAYMTU=; b=H36ehHBKodmEqbkF2kPjxyitJGb/Ad3GOKQnAlUsYxwqxE3NI5JlA0CZ 2lO4mW+b4Q2fqJXpkGF1P+pvjYWLFjYY7BXC0kXBWffOEdfrkov6tmCgH yfayde1/j4f9uvNboBzohAeeCX21NigmiyXxdy0Euf2eeo5/Uz18TZsED bWIWk34f2pUaOkCGQd4anWKC0sK2w2pYBtk0jn2LlzqJnx6otAivO8JvQ akZXmYSTBgl+V/v8u/5tuK8ZNTWjYA/azTyb4tYghxel8/ZMxb9CxC9oj pLpDZlKFQuGqm2rf5MThHNxuwpB36ty+KmFUqNCFbMNFVGx1Cf4hfU+Z1 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2laFMSeZTDuwZpH+yAOCsA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: WntRLvXPShibR1AnoeRH8w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11693"; a="75468353" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,277,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="75468353" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Feb 2026 11:22:52 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qm7SQkvhRxqu0mXlO7r91Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 15DK0z3WRyeAEDX7vape3g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,277,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="215929553" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO afc5bfd7f602) ([10.211.93.152]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2026 11:22:50 -0800 Received: from kbuild by afc5bfd7f602 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1voRPj-000000004hB-2y7H; Fri, 06 Feb 2026 19:22:47 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 20:22:00 +0100 From: kernel test robot To: sunliming@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yukuai@fnnas.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linan666@huaweicloud.com, sunliming Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] lib/raid6: Optimizing the raid6_select_algo time through asynchronous processing Message-ID: <202602062027.j08UeCWD-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260206054341.106878-3-sunliming@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260206054341.106878-3-sunliming@linux.dev> Hi, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-nonmm-unstable] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.16-rc1 next-20260205] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/sunliming-linux-dev/lib-raid6-Divide-the-raid6-algorithm-selection-process-into-two-parts/20260206-134850 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-nonmm-unstable patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260206054341.106878-3-sunliming%40linux.dev patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] lib/raid6: Optimizing the raid6_select_algo time through asynchronous processing config: arm64-allnoconfig-bpf (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260206/202602062027.j08UeCWD-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260206/202602062027.j08UeCWD-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602062027.j08UeCWD-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): >> WARNING: modpost: lib/raid6/raid6_pq: section mismatch in reference: raid6_exit+0xc (section: .text) -> raid6_benchmark_work (section: .init.data) WARNING: modpost: lib/raid6/raid6_pq: section mismatch in reference: raid6_exit+0x10 (section: .text) -> raid6_benchmark_work (section: .init.data) -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki