From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62D171A9F82; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 19:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770406493; cv=none; b=RNy7sNxdpyDRJb6pAzcoVlz0FOJmHSoICmTYAii/GK1JCdgSyUDV2A/BBU+ztQA6Bd4Db++S4ncGuzYsOWNa/n1g6sG5j7R0hoM0GADk2dfE/CAcFJIXfk07HgHyaVc2L6IfnSLikIRuH9annskhMEpkIglB8H7MAzr6BXV5xBA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770406493; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ITV7RnoHh0t7L+qb1wBTQ/KdocFTjVOticfmMkZAynE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gc2uPwEcay5cBUFxGHMrJTlVDrPSCOIrNt/DHRIcOi4WB1GlNRu6c5RL3Yt2egyT7MpCxQQ/LtICXW8hGUhZRPTQK7R8gqTEfwS76XlSS91ikt+jmbyTmqf8u+EAFKCalcLpkQpQCPYJXyObYy/5W3TMFPqqgcUtGHFCsdegXzw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=mgUzey+p; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="mgUzey+p" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770406493; x=1801942493; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ITV7RnoHh0t7L+qb1wBTQ/KdocFTjVOticfmMkZAynE=; b=mgUzey+pjSvbwjbIWEWgowZxbAOtjC+pBsUMY7phownRqal5bADg/2lt VZIxMCof7NLcNykttVttx6A6tXHx2nZ//iCjq5jRF5gdMxG6qUbrWDfLM 2yURc+KZoITxma6qH7k3Z5M3qLxtsxXNGBUzR0M1mEtwt6fVtKPYTkJYA VPlxfSketyd0uk9O8UIKXogfISD3wZj5o4x0ih3wVW3WLSgci2UoJGRkd gtvusF4TNtlvJZ/uZ8D8w4N8tfw7zCTPUmmAEexk6pPbauqJZbg1J69/Z SHUgoExmJqy4DSa5q7uB6kforKMxfab1Ns2fX/w7/eanwKtQS7+0hZXqG w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 7a4t9i9/Qv2BWJ+I9/gL0A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: rHoRHe/qQT2PrQtuXEq2LA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11693"; a="71801413" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,277,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="71801413" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Feb 2026 11:34:52 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 9j8E7j0pSyOGDkUdUxONGA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ps3E8N1/TnS7CZjTXI6ixQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,277,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="210755278" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO afc5bfd7f602) ([10.211.93.152]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2026 11:34:49 -0800 Received: from kbuild by afc5bfd7f602 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1voRbL-000000004hJ-3QgN; Fri, 06 Feb 2026 19:34:47 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 20:34:20 +0100 From: kernel test robot To: sunliming@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yukuai@fnnas.com Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linan666@huaweicloud.com, sunliming Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] lib/raid6: Optimizing the raid6_select_algo time through asynchronous processing Message-ID: <202602062049.sdwQ1NiZ-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260206054341.106878-3-sunliming@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260206054341.106878-3-sunliming@linux.dev> Hi, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-nonmm-unstable] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.16-rc1 next-20260205] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/sunliming-linux-dev/lib-raid6-Divide-the-raid6-algorithm-selection-process-into-two-parts/20260206-134850 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-nonmm-unstable patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260206054341.106878-3-sunliming%40linux.dev patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] lib/raid6: Optimizing the raid6_select_algo time through asynchronous processing config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260206/202602062049.sdwQ1NiZ-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260206/202602062049.sdwQ1NiZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602062049.sdwQ1NiZ-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): >> WARNING: modpost: lib/raid6/raid6_pq: section mismatch in reference: cleanup_module+0xc (section: .text) -> raid6_benchmark_work (section: .init.data) -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki