From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chen Cheng" <chencheng@fnnas.com>
Cc: yukuai@fygo.io, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] md/raid10: free r10bio before ending master_bio in raid_end_bio_io()
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2026 12:29:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260622122902.F25CD1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260622121312.1775322-4-chencheng@fnnas.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incomplete fix: identical Use-After-Free and mempool corruption in `raid_end_discard_bio`.
- [High] Memory leak of `r10_bio` on `REQ_NOWAIT` write requests during cluster resync or reshape.
--
commit 088539a2820315440079f31df4aa792c8a6bc547
Author: Chen Cheng <chencheng@fnnas.com>
md/raid10: free r10bio before ending master_bio in raid_end_bio_io()
This commit reorders the teardown sequence in raid_end_bio_io() to free
r10_bio before calling bio_endio(). This prevents a race condition where
a concurrent array reshape can alter the geometry and destroy the mempool
after the master bio completes but before the r10_bio is freed.
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> index d740744a97461..a4642c903b202 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> @@ -332,12 +332,12 @@ static void raid_end_bio_io(struct r10bio *r10_bio)
> {
> struct bio *bio = r10_bio->master_bio;
> struct r10conf *conf = r10_bio->mddev->private;
> + bool returned = test_and_set_bit(R10BIO_Returned, &r10_bio->state);
> + blk_status_t status = test_bit(R10BIO_Uptodate, &r10_bio->state)
> + ? BLK_STS_OK : BLK_STS_IOERR;
>
> - if (!test_and_set_bit(R10BIO_Returned, &r10_bio->state)) {
> - if (!test_bit(R10BIO_Uptodate, &r10_bio->state))
> - bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> - bio_endio(bio);
> - }
> + put_all_bios(conf, r10_bio);
> + mempool_free(r10_bio, conf->r10bio_pool);
>
> /*
> * Wake up any possible resync thread that waits for the device
> @@ -345,7 +345,10 @@ static void raid_end_bio_io(struct r10bio *r10_bio)
> */
> allow_barrier(conf);
>
> - free_r10bio(r10_bio);
> + if (!returned) {
> + bio->bi_status = status;
> + bio_endio(bio);
> + }
> }
>
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but the exact same race condition appears to
exist in the discard completion path.
In drivers/md/raid10.c:raid_end_discard_bio():
} else {
md_write_end(r10bio->mddev);
bio_endio(r10bio->master_bio);
free_r10bio(r10bio);
break;
}
Since bio_endio(r10bio->master_bio) drops active_io to zero, couldn't this
also wake up mddev_suspend() and allow a concurrent reshape to modify
conf->geo and destroy conf->r10bio_pool before free_r10bio() is called?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does raid10_write_request() leak the r10_bio
on REQ_NOWAIT requests?
In drivers/md/raid10.c:__make_request():
r10_bio = mempool_alloc(conf->r10bio_pool, GFP_NOIO);
...
if (bio_data_dir(bio) == READ)
raid10_read_request(mddev, bio, r10_bio);
else
raid10_write_request(mddev, bio, r10_bio);
Then in raid10_write_request() during clustered resync:
if ((mddev_is_clustered(mddev) &&
mddev->cluster_ops->area_resyncing(mddev, WRITE,
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector,
bio_end_sector(bio)))) {
DEFINE_WAIT(w);
/* Bail out if REQ_NOWAIT is set for the bio */
if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
return;
}
And later during reshape:
if (bio->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) {
allow_barrier(conf);
bio_wouldblock_error(bio);
return;
}
Since these paths return immediately, they leave the r10_bio allocated. Could
repeated REQ_NOWAIT rejections eventually exhaust conf->r10bio_pool, causing
subsequent allocations in __make_request() to hang indefinitely?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260622121312.1775322-1-chencheng@fnnas.com?part=3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-22 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-22 12:13 [PATCH v5 0/3] md/raid10: fix r10bio width mismatches across reshape Chen Cheng
2026-06-22 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] md: suspend array when sync_action=reshape Chen Cheng
2026-06-22 12:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] md/raid10: resize r10bio_pool for reshape Chen Cheng
2026-06-22 12:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-22 12:13 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] md/raid10: free r10bio before ending master_bio in raid_end_bio_io() Chen Cheng
2026-06-22 12:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260622122902.F25CD1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=chencheng@fnnas.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox