From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yu Kuai" <yukuai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, yukuai@fygo.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/20] md/raid5: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 07:29:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624072929.C43381F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f4bcf3a6cdb16689c42f2f5b5bb6b5dca0c84768.1782282042.git.yukuai@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Critical] Splitting a bio in `raid5_make_request()` breaks the `STRIPE_WAIT_RESHAPE` retry logic, causing a double-submission of the remainder and a permanent leak of the split front.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] `make_discard_request()` leaks the `REQ_OP_DISCARD` bio without completion if an array is reshaping or `REQ_NOWAIT` is set.
--
commit fd0cb884709b54fc9c1fe1f70aa2016108b2a998
Author: Yu Kuai <yukuai@fygo.io>
md/raid5: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting
The commit uses mddev_bio_split_at_reshape_offset() in
raid5_make_request() to split bios at the reshape offset. This ensures
that RAID5 submits only one-side bios to llbitmap during reshape.
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index ac7ea483502fd..fb346a3c4aa3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -6181,6 +6181,14 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
[ ... ]
> return true;
> }
>
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it possible for the discard bio to be
leaked if the array is reshaping or REQ_NOWAIT is set?
In make_discard_request() which is called just above this context, it returns
early without completing the bio:
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bi->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT))
return;
if (mddev->reshape_position != MaxSector)
return;
Since raid5_make_request() calls make_discard_request() and then unconditionally
returns true, does this strand the bio and cause indefinite hangs?
> + bi = mddev_bio_split_at_reshape_offset(mddev, bi, NULL,
> + &conf->bio_split);
[Severity: Critical]
Does splitting the bio here break the STRIPE_WAIT_RESHAPE retry logic and cause
a double-submission and memory leak?
When mddev_bio_split_at_reshape_offset() splits the bio, it submits the
remainder via bio_submit_split_bioset() and returns the front half as the
new bi.
Later in raid5_make_request(), if make_stripe_request() hits the reshape window
and returns STRIPE_WAIT_RESHAPE, it handles the retry:
if (res == STRIPE_WAIT_RESHAPE) {
DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done);
WRITE_ONCE(bi->bi_private, &done);
bio_endio(bi);
wait_for_completion(&done);
return false;
}
When false is returned, md_handle_request() loops and retries the original
bio pointer.
However, the original bio was already submitted as the remainder by the split
operation. Will this result in concurrently submitting the remainder twice?
Additionally, when completing the cloned front half (bi) with the completion
flag, md_end_clone_io() does not complete the original split bio, which
permanently leaks the front half.
> + if (!bi) {
> + if (rw == WRITE)
> + md_write_end(mddev);
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> logical_sector = bi->bi_iter.bi_sector & ~((sector_t)RAID5_STRIPE_SECTORS(conf)-1);
> bi->bi_next = NULL;
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1782282042.git.yukuai@kernel.org?part=20
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 9:15 [PATCH 00/20] md/md-llbitmap: support reshape for RAID10 and RAID5 Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md: add exact bitmap mapping and reshape hooks Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md: skip bitmap accounting for empty write ranges Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md: add helper to split bios at reshape offset Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/md-llbitmap: track bitmap sync_size explicitly Yu Kuai
2026-06-15 10:48 ` Su Yue
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/md-llbitmap: allocate page controls independently Yu Kuai
2026-06-15 11:06 ` Su Yue
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/md-llbitmap: grow the page cache in place for reshape Yu Kuai
2026-06-15 11:16 ` Su Yue
2026-06-15 16:19 ` yu kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/md-llbitmap: track target reshape geometry fields Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/md-llbitmap: finish reshape geometry Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/md-llbitmap: refuse reshape while llbitmap still needs sync Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/md-llbitmap: add reshape range mapping helpers Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/md-llbitmap: don't skip reshape ranges from bitmap state Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/md-llbitmap: remap checkpointed bits as reshape progresses Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/md-llbitmap: clamp state-machine walks to tracked bits Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/raid10: reject llbitmap reshape when md chunk shrinks Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/raid10: wire llbitmap reshape lifecycle Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/raid10: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/raid5: add exact old and new llbitmap mapping helpers Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/raid5: reject llbitmap reshape when md chunk shrinks Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/raid5: wire llbitmap reshape lifecycle Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH] md/raid5: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting Yu Kuai
2026-06-05 17:27 ` kernel test robot
2026-06-06 2:15 ` kernel test robot
2026-06-24 6:41 ` [PATCH v2 00/20] md/md-llbitmap: support reshape for RAID10 and RAID5 Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 6:41 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] md: add exact bitmap mapping and reshape hooks Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 6:41 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] md: skip bitmap accounting for empty write ranges Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] md: add helper to split bios at reshape offset Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] md/md-llbitmap: track bitmap sync_size explicitly Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] md/md-llbitmap: allocate page controls independently Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] md/md-llbitmap: grow the page cache in place for reshape Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] md/md-llbitmap: track target reshape geometry fields Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] md/md-llbitmap: finish reshape geometry Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 9:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] md/md-llbitmap: refuse reshape while llbitmap still needs sync Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] md/md-llbitmap: add reshape range mapping helpers Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] md/md-llbitmap: don't skip reshape ranges from bitmap state Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 6:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] md/md-llbitmap: remap checkpointed bits as reshape progresses Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] md/md-llbitmap: clamp state-machine walks to tracked bits Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] md/raid10: reject llbitmap reshape when md chunk shrinks Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] md/raid10: wire llbitmap reshape lifecycle Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] md/raid10: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] md/raid5: add exact old and new llbitmap mapping helpers Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] md/raid5: reject llbitmap reshape when md chunk shrinks Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] md/raid5: wire llbitmap reshape lifecycle Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] md/raid5: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting Yu Kuai
2026-06-24 7:29 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260624072929.C43381F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
--cc=yukuai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox