From: Hiroshi Nishida <nishidafmly@gmail.com>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai@fygo.io>
Cc: Li Nan <magiclinan@didiglobal.com>, Xiao Ni <xiao@kernel.org>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Hiroshi Nishida <nishidafmly@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] md/raid5: reserve stripe cache for user I/O during rebuild
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 06:23:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710132339.7284-3-nishidafmly@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710132339.7284-1-nishidafmly@gmail.com>
The resync read-ahead window (RAID5_SYNC_WINDOW) can fill the stripe
cache with rebuild stripes and starve concurrent user I/O, producing a
burst-starvation flip-flop between rebuild and application throughput.
Add two yield points to the window-submission loop:
- stop the window immediately if any thread is waiting for a stripe
(waitqueue_active(&conf->wait_for_stripe)); the check is intentionally
racy -- a waiter appearing just after is serviced by the next
sync_request call, so no barrier is needed.
- stop expanding once active_stripes reaches half the cache
(max_nr_stripes / RAID5_SYNC_HWMARK), but only when
preread_active_stripes > 0, i.e. user write I/O is actually competing.
Sync stripes never set STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, so during a pure rebuild
the counter stays zero and the window fills freely; rebuild-only
throughput is unchanged.
This bounds the share of the stripe cache a rebuild may hold while user
I/O is present, so application latency no longer collapses during the
read-ahead bursts, without throttling a rebuild that has the array to
itself.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Nishida <nishidafmly@gmail.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/md/raid5.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 574880e4f23f..6575bdb84bb2 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -6656,6 +6656,27 @@ static inline sector_t raid5_sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_n
submitted < RAID5_SYNC_WINDOW && win_sector < max_sector &&
win_sector < mddev->resync_max;
submitted++, win_sector += RAID5_STRIPE_SECTORS(conf)) {
+ /*
+ * Yield to user I/O: stop the read-ahead if anyone is waiting
+ * for a stripe. The check is intentionally racy -- a waiter
+ * appearing just after is serviced by the next sync_request
+ * call, so no barrier is needed.
+ */
+ if (waitqueue_active(&conf->wait_for_stripe))
+ break;
+ /*
+ * Reserve cache for user I/O only when it is actually competing.
+ * preread_active_stripes counts stripes queued for write I/O
+ * (including the read phase of RMW); sync stripes never set
+ * STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, so during a pure rebuild it stays zero
+ * and the window fills freely. Competing user reads do not bump
+ * the counter but are caught by the waitqueue_active() check
+ * above.
+ */
+ if (atomic_read(&conf->preread_active_stripes) > 0 &&
+ atomic_read(&conf->active_stripes) >=
+ conf->max_nr_stripes / RAID5_SYNC_HWMARK)
+ break;
sh = raid5_get_active_stripe(conf, NULL, win_sector,
R5_GAS_NOBLOCK);
if (!sh)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.h b/drivers/md/raid5.h
index 63b630118782..263330af4e7d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.h
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.h
@@ -492,6 +492,7 @@ struct disk_info {
#define HASH_MASK (NR_HASH - 1)
#define MAX_STRIPE_BATCH 8
#define RAID5_SYNC_WINDOW 32 /* stripes to pre-submit per sync_request call */
+#define RAID5_SYNC_HWMARK 2 /* rebuild uses at most 1/N of stripe cache */
/* NOTE NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS must remain below 64.
* This is because we sometimes take all the spinlocks
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 13:23 [PATCH 0/2] md/raid5: reduce resync/recovery dispatch overhead Hiroshi Nishida
2026-07-10 13:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] md/raid5: submit a window of stripes during resync/recovery Hiroshi Nishida
2026-07-10 13:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 13:23 ` Hiroshi Nishida [this message]
2026-07-10 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] md/raid5: reserve stripe cache for user I/O during rebuild sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710132339.7284-3-nishidafmly@gmail.com \
--to=nishidafmly@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magiclinan@didiglobal.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xiao@kernel.org \
--cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox