Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chen Cheng" <chencheng@fnnas.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, yukuai@fygo.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] md: scope memalloc_noio to allocation critical sections
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 08:56:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260718085628.7E8CE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260718084218.417895-1-chencheng@fnnas.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] In `backlog_store()`, an error path unlocks the mddev but fails to resume it, leaving the array permanently suspended.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2] md: scope memalloc_noio to allocation critical sections ---
commit 6df6cebcdd6ace34da5732a820e0ad95df14d0fc
Author: Chen Cheng <chencheng@fnnas.com>

    md: scope memalloc_noio to allocation critical sections

This patch fixes a token leak issue where PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO could leak across
tasks when saving the token in mddev_suspend() and restoring it in
mddev_resume(). It refactors the code to call memalloc_noio_save() directly
before memory allocation in mdraid operations after the array has been
successfully suspended.

Link: https://github.com/chencheng-fnnas/reproducer/blob/main/repro-md-noio-token-leak.sh

> diff --git a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
> index 0f02e2956398d..f005bc9494ecf 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md-bitmap.c
> @@ -2629,10 +2629,12 @@ static ssize_t
>  location_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
>  {
>  	int rv;
> +	unsigned int noio_flags;
>  
>  	rv = mddev_suspend_and_lock(mddev);
>  	if (rv)
>  		return rv;
> +	noio_flags = memalloc_noio_save();

[ ... ]

While reviewing this file, I noticed a pre-existing issue in backlog_store():

drivers/md/md-bitmap.c:backlog_store() {
    ...
	rv = mddev_suspend_and_lock(mddev);
	if (rv)
		return rv;

	/*
	 * Without write mostly device, it doesn't make sense to set
	 * backlog for max_write_behind.
	 */
	rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
		if (test_bit(WriteMostly, &rdev->flags)) {
			has_write_mostly = true;
			break;
		}
	}
	if (!has_write_mostly) {
		pr_warn_ratelimited("%s: can't set backlog, no write mostly device available\n",
				    mdname(mddev));
		mddev_unlock(mddev);
		return -EINVAL;
	}
    ...
}

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but the error path for !has_write_mostly in
backlog_store() calls mddev_unlock(mddev) instead of
mddev_unlock_and_resume(mddev).

If a privileged user writes to the bitmap/backlog sysfs file when there are no
write-mostly devices in the array, mddev_suspend_and_lock(mddev) is called, but
the array is never resumed on this error path. 

Does this permanently leave mddev->suspended elevated, blocking normal I/O
processing and any future suspend/resume operations on the array?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260718084218.417895-1-chencheng@fnnas.com?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-18  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-18  8:42 [PATCH v2] md: scope memalloc_noio to allocation critical sections Chen Cheng
2026-07-18  8:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260718085628.7E8CE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=chencheng@fnnas.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox