Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mykola Marzhan" <mykola@meshstor.io>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, yukuai@fygo.io, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] md: ensure REQ_NOMERGE is set on P2PDMA bios
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 16:50:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260718165044.565481F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260718162547.448892-3-mykola@meshstor.io>

> md_submit_bio() unconditionally strips REQ_NOMERGE before passing the
> bio to the personality, an optimization from commit 9c573de3283a ("MD:
> make bio mergeable"): a bio that md has split may become mergeable
> again below md.
> 
> For PCI P2PDMA bios the flag is load-bearing, not a hint. The block
> layer sets REQ_NOMERGE on P2PDMA bios (__bio_add_page(), and the
> extraction path of bio_iov_iter_get_pages()) because the DMA mapping
> type of a request is resolved once, from its first segment
> (blk_dma_map_iter_start()), and request-level merging is prevented
> only by REQ_NOMERGE. Stripping it allows the member queue to merge a
> P2PDMA bio with a bio carrying pages of a different pgmap, or host
> memory, mapping the merged segments with the wrong bus address:
> silent data corruption on the member.
> 
> Set the flag for P2PDMA bios instead of merely preserving it. No
> in-tree path currently submits P2PDMA pages through the bvec-iter
> path (bio_iov_bvec_set()), which skips the flagging -- but nothing
> structural prevents one, so setting rather than preserving hardens
> md against that gap at the cost of one branch. Everything else keeps
> the original optimization of clearing the flag. This covers every
> personality that advertises BLK_FEAT_PCI_P2PDMA (raid0, raid1,
> raid10), which is why the fix lives in the shared md_submit_bio()
> path.
> 
> Fixes: 02666132403a ("md: propagate BLK_FEAT_PCI_P2PDMA from member devices to RAID device")
> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
> Signed-off-by: Mykola Marzhan <mykola@meshstor.io>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260718162547.448892-1-mykola@meshstor.io?part=2


  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-18 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-18 16:25 [PATCH 0/6] block,md,nvme: correct handling of unsupported P2PDMA transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-18 16:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] blk-mq-dma: restore BLK_STS_TARGET for unsupported P2P transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-18 16:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 16:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] md: ensure REQ_NOMERGE is set on P2PDMA bios Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-18 16:50   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-18 16:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] md/raid1: don't use write-behind for " Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-18 16:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 16:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] md/raid1,raid10: keep REQ_NOMERGE on narrow_write_error() retry clones Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-18 16:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 16:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] md/raid1,raid10: skip futile retries on P2PDMA mapping failures Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-18 17:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-18 16:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] nvme-rdma: return BLK_STS_TARGET for unsupported P2P transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-18 17:12   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260718165044.565481F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mykola@meshstor.io \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox