From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mykola Marzhan" <mykola@meshstor.io>
Cc: yukuai@fygo.io, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] nvme-rdma: return BLK_STS_P2PDMA for unsupported P2P transfers
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:20:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722192038.2E4631F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260722185841.449934-10-mykola@meshstor.io>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Calling nvme_start_request() after mapping the data for DMA causes stale metadata to be read by the RDMA device on non-coherent architectures.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Accessing `rq` and `req->sqe.dma` in the error path after `nvme_host_path_error(rq)` completes and frees the request.
- [High] Returning BLK_STS_IOERR or BLK_STS_P2PDMA directly to the block layer after nvme_start_request() has been called leaks the multipath nr_active counter and I/O stats.
--
--- Patch [9]: [PATCH v4 9/9] nvme-rdma: return BLK_STS_P2PDMA for unsupported P2P transfers ---
commit 53acbc82938f48638ba2fe9095582a69fb22439e
Author: Mykola Marzhan <mykola@meshstor.io>
nvme-rdma: return BLK_STS_P2PDMA for unsupported P2P transfers
When the PCIe topology cannot route a P2P transfer between two devices,
the DMA layer fails the mapping with -EREMOTEIO, but ib_dma_map_sg()
returns 0 and the error is lost. nvme-rdma then fails the I/O with a
retryable status, so multipath requeues it forever and a single path
wastes its whole retry budget on an I/O that can never succeed.
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> index 6909e35427942..2f50509a7a616 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2026,8 +2029,6 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> if (ret)
> goto unmap_qe;
>
> - nvme_start_request(rq);
> -
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY) &&
> queue->pi_support &&
> (c->common.opcode == nvme_cmd_write ||
> @@ -2039,11 +2040,13 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
>
> err = nvme_rdma_map_data(queue, rq, c);
> if (unlikely(err < 0)) {
> - dev_err(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device,
> - "Failed to map data (%d)\n", err);
> + dev_err_ratelimited(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device,
> + "Failed to map data (%d)\n", err);
> goto err;
> }
>
> + nvme_start_request(rq);
> +
[Severity: High]
Does moving nvme_start_request() here cause stale metadata to be read on
non-coherent architectures?
nvme_start_request() invokes blk_integrity_prepare(), which writes to the PI
metadata buffer via the CPU. Since this now happens after the metadata has
already been mapped for DMA in nvme_rdma_map_data(), these CPU writes won't
be flushed to main memory before the RDMA device accesses them.
> sqe->cqe.done = nvme_rdma_send_done;
>
> ib_dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, sqe->dma,
> @@ -2063,6 +2066,9 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> ret = nvme_host_path_error(rq);
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this lead to a use-after-free?
nvme_host_path_error() synchronously completes the request via
__nvme_complete_rq(), freeing it back to the block layer where it can be
immediately reallocated.
The error path then continues to dereference rq and req->sqe.dma:
nvme_cleanup_cmd(rq);
unmap_qe:
ib_dma_unmap_single(dev, req->sqe.dma, sizeof(struct nvme_command),
DMA_TO_DEVICE);
Could this corrupt the newly reallocated request if it's reused by another CPU?
> else if (err == -ENOMEM || err == -EAGAIN)
> ret = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> + /* Peer memory unreachable from this device: don't retry. */
> + else if (err == -EREMOTEIO)
> + ret = BLK_STS_P2PDMA;
> else
> ret = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> nvme_cleanup_cmd(rq);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does returning an error status
directly to the block layer after nvme_start_request() leak multipath
counters?
When nvme_start_request() is executed, it increments the queue depth counter
(nr_active) and starts I/O accounting via nvme_mpath_start_request().
If the driver then returns an error status (like BLK_STS_P2PDMA or
BLK_STS_IOERR) to blk-mq, blk-mq completes the request directly, bypassing the
driver's nvme_mpath_end_request() hook. This permanently leaks the nr_active
counter.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260722185841.449934-1-mykola@meshstor.io?part=9
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-22 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-22 18:58 [PATCH v4 0/9] block,md,nvme: correct handling of unsupported P2PDMA transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-22 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] block: add BLK_STS_P2PDMA for unsupported peer-to-peer transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-22 19:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] md: ensure REQ_NOMERGE is set on P2PDMA bios Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-22 19:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] md/raid1: serialize non-write-behind writes on CollisionCheck rdevs Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-22 19:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] md/raid1: don't use write-behind for P2PDMA bios Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-22 19:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] md/raid1,raid10: factor out raid1_write_error() helper Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-22 19:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] md/raid1,raid10: keep REQ_NOMERGE on narrow_write_error() retry clones Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-22 19:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] md/raid1,raid10: skip futile retries on P2PDMA mapping failures Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-22 19:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 19:18 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-22 19:50 ` Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-22 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] md/raid1,raid10: set IO_BLOCKED in case of BLK_STS_P2PDMA Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-22 19:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-22 19:19 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2026-07-22 20:02 ` Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-22 18:58 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] nvme-rdma: return BLK_STS_P2PDMA for unsupported P2P transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-22 19:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260722192038.2E4631F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mykola@meshstor.io \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox