From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mykola Marzhan" <mykola@meshstor.io>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, yukuai@fygo.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/12] nvme-rdma: return BLK_STS_P2PDMA for unsupported P2P transfers
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 12:10:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260726121014.4337F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260726113229.2154269-11-mykola@meshstor.io>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] DMA API violation causing stale PI metadata (Data Corruption).
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incomplete fix: multipath I/O accounting leak on nvme_rdma_post_send() failure.
--
--- Patch [10]: [PATCH v6 10/12] nvme-rdma: return BLK_STS_P2PDMA for unsupported P2P transfers ---
commit d3d8febf3662843e41333a6adc3c3ea1d88ff373
Author: Mykola Marzhan <mykola@meshstor.io>
nvme-rdma: return BLK_STS_P2PDMA for unsupported P2P transfers
This commit propagates -EREMOTEIO from ib_dma_map_sgtable_attrs() as BLK_STS_P2PDMA
to prevent infinite multipath requeues. It also delays nvme_start_request() until
after data mapping succeeds to avoid multipath accounting leaks on mapping errors.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.1: requires BLK_STS_P2PDMA and the ib_dma_map_sgtable_attrs() conversion
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> index 63830334c73e2..c38d949502b7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/rdma.c
> @@ -2033,8 +2029,6 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> if (ret)
> goto unmap_qe;
>
> - nvme_start_request(rq);
> -
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INTEGRITY) &&
> queue->pi_support &&
> (c->common.opcode == nvme_cmd_write ||
> @@ -2051,6 +2045,8 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> goto err;
> }
>
> + nvme_start_request(rq);
> +
[Severity: High]
Does moving nvme_start_request() after nvme_rdma_map_data() violate the DMA API?
nvme_start_request() calls blk_mq_start_request(), which invokes
blk_integrity_prepare(). This modifies the PI metadata buffers in CPU memory
to update reference tags.
Because nvme_rdma_map_data() has already mapped these buffers for DMA
(DMA_TO_DEVICE), could CPU writes happening after the map operation remain
unsynced on non-coherent architectures or when bounce buffers are used?
This might cause the device to read stale PI metadata, leading to PI
verification failures or data corruption.
> sqe->cqe.done = nvme_rdma_send_done;
>
> ib_dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, sqe->dma,
[ ... ]
> @@ -2070,6 +2066,9 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_rdma_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> ret = nvme_host_path_error(rq);
> else if (err == -ENOMEM || err == -EAGAIN)
> ret = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> + /* Peer memory unreachable from this device: don't retry. */
> + else if (err == -EREMOTEIO)
> + ret = BLK_STS_P2PDMA;
> else
> ret = BLK_STS_IOERR;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed a potential multipath I/O
accounting leak if nvme_rdma_post_send() fails.
The commit message notes that starting the request before a failure causes
multipath accounting leaks when blk-mq hard-completes the request directly.
If nvme_rdma_post_send() fails (e.g., returns -EINVAL), execution jumps to
err_unmap and falls through to the err: block, returning a hard error status
like BLK_STS_IOERR:
err = nvme_rdma_post_send(queue, sqe, ...);
if (unlikely(err))
goto err_unmap;
...
err:
...
else
ret = BLK_STS_IOERR;
Since nvme_start_request() was already called, will blk-mq hard-complete the
request directly, bypassing the driver's nvme_mpath_end_request() and leaking
multipath accounting like bd_stats->in_flight and nr_active?
This could permanently block block device teardown.
> nvme_cleanup_cmd(rq);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260726113229.2154269-1-mykola@meshstor.io?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-26 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-26 11:32 [PATCH v6 00/12] block,md,nvme: correct handling of unsupported P2PDMA transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] block: add BLK_STS_P2PDMA for unsupported peer-to-peer transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] md: ensure REQ_NOMERGE is set on P2PDMA bios Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 11:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] md/raid1: serialize non-write-behind writes on CollisionCheck rdevs Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] md/raid1: don't use write-behind for P2PDMA bios Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] md/raid1,raid10: factor out raid1_write_error() helper Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 11:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] md/raid1,raid10: keep REQ_NOMERGE on narrow_write_error() retry clones Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] md/raid1,raid10: skip futile retries on P2PDMA mapping failures Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] md/raid1,raid10: set IO_BLOCKED in case of BLK_STS_P2PDMA Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] nvme-rdma: use ib_dma_map_sgtable_attrs() Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] nvme-rdma: return BLK_STS_P2PDMA for unsupported P2P transfers Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] nvme-rdma: ratelimit the map-failure error message Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 11:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 11:32 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] nvme-rdma: factor out the scatterlist DMA mapping helper Mykola Marzhan
2026-07-26 12:02 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260726121014.4337F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mykola@meshstor.io \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox