Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yu Kuai" <yukuai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, yukuai@fygo.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/21] md/raid10: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 09:15:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728091541.83E7A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8abef42ad491fe452b82d672c2fdeb6c64c20c91.1785206690.git.yukuai@fygo.io>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Missing `md_write_end()` when `mddev_bio_split_at_reshape_offset()` fails on a write bio, leaking `mddev->writes_pending` reference count.
- [High] Mempool exhaustion deadlock due to double bio allocation from `conf->bio_split` without a rescuer thread.
--

--- Patch [17]: [PATCH v3 17/21] md/raid10: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting ---
commit f435d38ffb898e662e1e9b6225ad90d266d26363
Author: Yu Kuai <yukuai@fygo.io>

md/raid10: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting
    
This patch updates raid10 to use the shared mddev_bio_split_at_reshape_offset()
helper. This ensures that RAID10 submits only one-side bios to llbitmap during
reshape operations.

> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> index e50e4adee389f..fd364a2e2fd98 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> @@ -1911,6 +1911,12 @@ static bool raid10_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bio)
>  		sectors = chunk_sects -
>  			(bio->bi_iter.bi_sector &
>  			 (chunk_sects - 1));
> +
> +	bio = mddev_bio_split_at_reshape_offset(mddev, bio, &sectors,
> +						&conf->bio_split);

[Severity: High]
Could this lead to a mempool exhaustion deadlock if bad blocks are present?

This splits the bio using conf->bio_split, and passes the split bio down
to __make_request(). If there are bad blocks that restrict the sector count
further, the lower level routines perform a second split using the exact
same bio_set:

drivers/md/raid10.c:raid10_write_request() {
    ...
    bio = bio_submit_split_bioset(bio, r10_bio->sectors,
                                  &conf->bio_split);
    ...
}

Since conf->bio_split lacks a rescuer thread, would two concurrent I/Os
that both cross a chunk boundary and hit a bad block exhaust the pool and
stall indefinitely?

> +	if (!bio)
> +		return true;

[Severity: High]
Does this early return leak the mddev->writes_pending reference?

Earlier in raid10_make_request(), we call md_write_start() which increments
the writes_pending count for write bios:

drivers/md/raid10.c:raid10_make_request() {
    ...
    md_write_start(mddev, bio);
    ...
}

If the bio is an atomic write that cannot be split,
mddev_bio_split_at_reshape_offset() returns NULL. When we return true here,
we bypass the md_write_end() cleanup at the end of the function, which
might hang the array when it is later suspended or stopped.

> +
>  	if (!__make_request(mddev, bio, sectors))
>  		md_write_end(mddev);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1785206690.git.yukuai@fygo.io?part=17

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-28  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-28  8:49 [PATCH v3 00/21] md/md-llbitmap: support reshape for RAID10 and RAID5 Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] md/raid5: round bitmap stripes with sector division Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] md: add exact bitmap mapping and reshape hooks Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] md: skip bitmap accounting for empty write ranges Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] md: add helper to split bios at reshape offset Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] md/md-llbitmap: track bitmap sync_size explicitly Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] md/md-llbitmap: allocate page controls independently Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] md/md-llbitmap: grow the page cache in place for reshape Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] md/md-llbitmap: track target reshape geometry fields Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] md/md-llbitmap: finish reshape geometry Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] md/md-llbitmap: refuse reshape while llbitmap still needs sync Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] md/md-llbitmap: add reshape range mapping helpers Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] md/md-llbitmap: don't skip reshape ranges from bitmap state Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] md/md-llbitmap: remap checkpointed bits as reshape progresses Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] md/md-llbitmap: clamp state-machine walks to tracked bits Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] md/raid10: reject llbitmap reshape when md chunk shrinks Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] md/raid10: wire llbitmap reshape lifecycle Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] md/raid10: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:15   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] md/raid5: add exact old and new llbitmap mapping helpers Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] md/raid5: reject llbitmap reshape when md chunk shrinks Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] md/raid5: wire llbitmap reshape lifecycle Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28  8:49 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] md/raid5: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting Yu Kuai
2026-07-28  9:26   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260728091541.83E7A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
    --cc=yukuai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox