Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Zizhi Wo" <wozizhi@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, yukuai@fygo.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md/raid10: fix missing wakeup in wait_barrier_nolock
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 14:12:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810141216.3AE7F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810135521.3470422-1-wozizhi@huaweicloud.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Lockless read of `conf->array_freeze_pending` lacks `READ_ONCE()`, violating kernel concurrency guidelines and potentially triggering KCSAN warnings.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] md/raid10: fix missing wakeup in wait_barrier_nolock ---
commit 3470079c0f4271a77d161b3a70575176ea1d322b
Author: Zizhi Wo <wozizhi@huawei.com>

md/raid10: fix missing wakeup in wait_barrier_nolock

This commit fixes a hung task issue in RAID10 by ensuring that
wait_barrier_nolock() properly wakes up a pending freeze_array(). It adds a
wake-up condition for conf->array_freeze_pending when the pending counter is
decremented.

> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> index 0a3cfdd3f5df8..fad634a444f89 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -996,7 +996,8 @@ static bool wait_barrier_nolock(struct r10conf *conf)
>  	if (!read_seqretry(&conf->resync_lock, seq))
>  		return true;
>  
> -	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&conf->nr_pending))
> +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&conf->nr_pending) ||
> +	    conf->array_freeze_pending)

[Severity: Low]
Does this lockless read of conf->array_freeze_pending need a READ_ONCE()
wrapper?

Since freeze_array() modifies this variable under the resync_lock seqlock,
reading it here locklessly might trigger KCSAN data race warnings or be
subject to compiler optimizations. 

While atomic_dec_and_test() provides a memory barrier, kernel concurrency
guidelines generally require READ_ONCE() for plain lockless reads of shared
variables to prevent compiler optimizations.

It looks like this pattern was copied from allow_barrier(), which also has a
lockless read without READ_ONCE():

drivers/md/raid10.c:allow_barrier() {
    ...
    if ((atomic_dec_and_test(&conf->nr_pending)) ||
        (conf->array_freeze_pending))
        wake_up_barrier(conf);
    ...
}

Should both of these locations be updated to use
READ_ONCE(conf->array_freeze_pending)?

>  		wake_up_barrier(conf);
>  
>  	return false;

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260810135521.3470422-1-wozizhi@huaweicloud.com?part=1

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-10 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-10 13:55 [PATCH] md/raid10: fix missing wakeup in wait_barrier_nolock Zizhi Wo
2026-08-10 14:12 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260810141216.3AE7F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=wozizhi@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox