Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chandradhar Kumar" <chandradhar.2003@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, yukuai@fygo.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] md/raid0: validate device count before allocating devlist
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2026 18:55:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260906185532.E26CC1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260906184406.2141-1-chandradhar.2003@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Integer overflow in `chunk_size` sysfs handler allows a zero-division kernel panic in `map_sector()`.
--

commit ff4c12b29e562bce41f4e75365704e1e7f8e00b2
Author: Chandradhar Kumar <chandradhar.2003@gmail.com>

md/raid0: validate device count before allocating devlist

create_strip_zones() allocates conf->devlist based on mddev->raid_disks
before verifying that enough devices are present. Validate the number of
member devices before allocating devlist to reject invalid
configurations early.

Reported-by: syzbot+a32ff75e417c0f49a8e9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzbot.org/bug?extid=a32ff75e417c0f49a8e9

> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid0.c b/drivers/md/raid0.c
> index 35e103f0c2c3e..8eaf078606d6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid0.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid0.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -144,6 +147,21 @@ static int create_strip_zones(struct mddev *mddev, struct r0conf **private_conf)
>  	}
>  
>  	err = -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	if (mddev->raid_disks <= 0) {
> +		pr_warn("md/raid0:%s: invalid number of disks %d - aborting!\n",
> +			mdname(mddev), mddev->raid_disks);
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto abort;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (nr_devs < mddev->raid_disks) {
> +		pr_warn("md/raid0:%s: too few disks (%d of %d) - aborting!\n",
> +			mdname(mddev), nr_devs, mddev->raid_disks);
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto abort;
> +	}
> +
>  	conf->strip_zone = kvzalloc_objs(struct strip_zone, conf->nr_strip_zones);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code allow an integer overflow
in mddev->chunk_sectors that leads to a division-by-zero kernel panic in
map_sector()?

In drivers/md/md.c:chunk_size_store(), the chunk size is parsed with no
upper bounds checking:

	err = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &n);
	...
	mddev->chunk_sectors = n >> 9;

A large value written to the chunk_size sysfs node of a non-running RAID0
array is bitshifted and truncated into the 32-bit signed integer
mddev->chunk_sectors.

When the array is started and I/O is submitted, the code in map_sector()
can overflow:

drivers/md/raid0.c:map_sector() {
	...
		sector_div(chunk, zone->nb_dev << chunksect_bits);
	} else{
		sect_in_chunk = sector_div(sector, chunk_sects);
		chunk = *sector_offset;
		sector_div(chunk, chunk_sects * zone->nb_dev);
	}
	...
}

If chunk_sects is a power of 2 (e.g., 0x80000000) and nb_dev = 2,
zone->nb_dev << chunksect_bits evaluates to 2 << 31, which overflows to 0
in 32-bit math.

If chunk_sects is not a power of 2 (e.g., 0xC0000000) and nb_dev = 4,
chunk_sects * zone->nb_dev evaluates to 0xC0000000 * 4, which also overflows
to 0.

In both branches, sector_div(chunk, 0) executes and panics the kernel. Can
chunk_size_store() be updated to validate the upper bounds of chunk_size to
prevent this crash?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260906184406.2141-1-chandradhar.2003@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-06 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-06 18:44 [PATCH v2] md/raid0: validate device count before allocating devlist Chandradhar Kumar
2026-09-06 18:55 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-07  6:49 ` yu kuai
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-06 14:39 [PATCH] " Chandradhar Kumar
2026-09-06 17:37 ` [PATCH v2] " Chandradhar Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260906185532.E26CC1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandradhar.2003@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox