Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Yu Kuai <yukuai@fygo.io>
Cc: Li Nan <magiclinan@didiglobal.com>, Xiao Ni <xiao@kernel.org>,
	Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>,
	syzbot+75d7e96ad03ac2dbbd9f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] md: take reconfig_mutex when enabling PPL on an inactive array
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:13:45 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924171345.75894-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com> (raw)

consistency_policy_store() sets MD_HAS_PPL for an external-metadata array
that is not running yet, without holding reconfig_mutex.  But ->pers is
only assigned after pers->run() returns, so "not running" also covers an
md_run() that is in progress under the lock.

If the write lands inside raid5_run() after log_init() has decided not to
set up PPL, or after a failed ppl_init_log() has cleared the flag, the
flag ends up set with conf->log_private still NULL.  The next idle pass
of raid5d() then does:

  raid5d() -> handle_active_stripes() -> log_flush_stripe_to_raid()
    -> ppl_write_stripe_run()

and dereferences the NULL ppl_conf:

  Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000002
  KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000010-0x0000000000000017]
  RIP: 0010:ppl_write_stripe_run+0x60/0x1320 drivers/md/raid5-ppl.c:538

Take reconfig_mutex around the update and refuse it with -EBUSY once the
array is running, in which case ->change_consistency_policy() is the
right interface.

Fixes: 664aed04446c ("md: add sysfs entries for PPL")
Reported-by: syzbot+75d7e96ad03ac2dbbd9f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=75d7e96ad03ac2dbbd9f
Signed-off-by: Nguyen Ngoc Thang <ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com>
---
Notes:

This differs from the NULL check in ppl_write_stripe_run() that is being
patch-tested on the syzbot page: that hides the symptom but leaves
MD_HAS_PPL inconsistent with conf->log_private for the other PPL entry
points.  md_attr_store() has not taken reconfig_mutex for every store since
6791875e2e53, so the store has to take it itself.

Testing (QEMU, KASAN, x86_64): one loop assembles raid5/external/ram0 while
a second loop keeps writing "ppl" to consistency_policy.  Without a delay the
window is only a few microseconds, so I used a debug-only patch in
raid5_run() (clear MD_HAS_PPL and mdelay(50) before log_init()) that is not
part of this submission.
  - without the fix: the syzbot oops on the first assembly,
    ppl_write_stripe_run+0x5d in md0_raid5;
  - with the fix and the same delay: 100/100 assemblies, no KASAN report.
The unmodified syz repro only ended with -ENOSPC ("PPL space too small") in
my setup.

 drivers/md/md.c | 10 +++++++++-
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 680b34a63cb3..5b2add94631b 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -5884,7 +5884,15 @@ consistency_policy_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *buf, size_t len)
 		else
 			err = -EBUSY;
 	} else if (mddev->external && strncmp(buf, "ppl", 3) == 0) {
-		set_bit(MD_HAS_PPL, &mddev->flags);
+		/* md_run() holds the lock until ->pers is set */
+		err = mddev_lock(mddev);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+		if (mddev->pers)
+			err = -EBUSY;
+		else
+			set_bit(MD_HAS_PPL, &mddev->flags);
+		mddev_unlock(mddev);
 	} else {
 		err = -EINVAL;
 	}
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 17:13 Nguyen Ngoc Thang [this message]
2026-10-04  3:52 ` [PATCH] md: take reconfig_mutex when enabling PPL on an inactive array yu kuai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260924171345.75894-1-ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com \
    --to=ngocthang2710.1999@gmail.com \
    --cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magiclinan@didiglobal.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+75d7e96ad03ac2dbbd9f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=xiao@kernel.org \
    --cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox