From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: md/raid10: Replace printk() calls by the usage of higher level interfaces Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 20:04:55 +0200 Message-ID: <21fb08b6-d5b7-0dd6-0cbd-0f0a4bf56a9e@users.sourceforge.net> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <786843ef-4b6f-eb04-7326-2f6f5b408826@users.sourceforge.net> <1475771616.1914.9.camel@perches.com> <321cc4aa-679a-a2fe-be0b-96285b19e489@users.sourceforge.net> <1475775546.1914.15.camel@perches.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1475775546.1914.15.camel@perches.com> Sender: kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Guoqing Jiang , Jens Axboe , Mike Christie , Neil Brown , Shaohua Li , Tomasz Majchrzak , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall List-Id: linux-raid.ids >> How should a multiline log message be achieved as it was constructed >> in the function "raid10_error" (for example)? >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/md/raid10.c?id=c802e87fbe2d4dd58982d01b3c39bc5a781223aa#n1589 > > As two individual calls to pr_alert I know also such an approach. Would it be nicer if a single call will be sufficient for such a log message? Can an idea picked up which was discussed for the update suggestion "[PATCH 4/4] Input-gameport: Replace some printk() calls by pr_info() in joydump_connect()" for a moment (on 2016-09-24)? https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1474735656.23838.6.camel@perches.com> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/24/149 Regards, Markus