From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: pg@lxra2.for.sabi.co.UK (Peter Grandi)
Subject: Re: Intel SSD or other brands
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 17:46:40 +0000
Message-ID: <22629.19456.78167.898302@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk>
References: <0329d841-984b-fa25-0bf2-0aba4d55b6de@websitemanagers.com.au>
        <22628.62979.46926.463323@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk>
        <8c0e48b3-e224-1e0e-13fe-987a58411e06@websitemanagers.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <8c0e48b3-e224-1e0e-13fe-987a58411e06@websitemanagers.com.au>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Linux RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

>> Well "performance" can be roughly the same, even if "speed" can
>> be very different. http://www.sabi.co.uk/blog/15-two.html#151023

> [ ... ] what you mean to say here, [ ... ]

Some people may say that 'eatmydata $COMMAND' can improve a lot
the "performance" of running '$COMMAND'. More properly it can
improve its speed, but its performance arguably goes to zero or
more precisely becomes insignificant, in most cases. That's a
pretty huge difference.