From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pg@lxra2.for.sabi.co.UK (Peter Grandi) Subject: Re: Intel SSD or other brands Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:37:38 +0000 Message-ID: <22629.22514.589919.102122@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk> References: <0329d841-984b-fa25-0bf2-0aba4d55b6de@websitemanagers.com.au> <22629.18653.431222.163351@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <22629.18653.431222.163351@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linux RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids >> [ ... ] sync=1 really differentiates drives and you really >> find which drives are better. [ ... ] > It is not necessarily "better" in a strict sense: flash SSD > devices with supercapacitor-backed persistent caches [ ... ] http://www.storagereview.com/images/Samsung-SSD-SM825-PCB-Bottom.jpg http://www.storagereview.com/samsung_ssd_sm825_enterprise_ssd_review http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/09/24/storage_supercapacitors/ http://us.apacer.com/business/technology/CorePower_Technology http://www.badcaps.net/forum/showthread.php?t=34417