From: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>, linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: shli@kernel.org
Subject: Re: Stuck in md_write_start because MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING can't be cleared
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 10:45:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22698eb3-35f7-04e5-96e8-26470d892655@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877exfdx7x.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
On 09/04/2017 10:16 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02 2017, Xiao Ni wrote:
>
>> Hi Neil and Shaohua
>>
>> I'm trying to reproduce the problem the problem "raid5_finish_reshape is stuck at revalidate_disk".
>> But there is a new stuck. I tried with 4.13.0-rc5 and latest mdadm. The steps are:
>>
>> #!/bin/bash
>> num=0
>> while [ 1 ]
>> do
>> echo "*************************$num"
>> mdadm -Ss
>> mdadm --create --run /dev/md0 --level 5 --metadata 1.2 --raid-devices 5 /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1 /dev/loop2 /dev/loop3 /dev/loop4 --spare-devices 1 /dev/loop5 --chunk 512
>> mdadm --wait /dev/md0
>> mkfs -t ext4 /dev/md0
>> mount -t ext4 /dev/md0 /mnt/md_test
>> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/md_test/testfile bs=1M count=100
>> mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/loop6
>> mdadm --grow --raid-devices 6 /dev/md0
>> dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/md_test/testfile bs=1M count=1000
>> mdadm --wait /dev/md0
>> ((num++))
>> umount /dev/md0
>> done
>>
>> The calltrace messages are:
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: INFO: task kworker/u8:4:21401 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: Tainted: G OE 4.13.0-rc5 #2
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: kworker/u8:4 D 0 21401 2 0x00000080
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-9:0)
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: Call Trace:
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: __schedule+0x28d/0x890
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: schedule+0x36/0x80
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: md_write_start+0xf0/0x220 [md_mod]
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: raid5_make_request+0x89/0x8b0 [raid456]
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: ? bio_split+0x5d/0x90
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: ? blk_queue_split+0xd2/0x630
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
>> Sep 1 13:57:25 localhost kernel: md_make_request+0xf5/0x260 [md_mod]
>> ....
>>
>> All the processes send bio to md are stuck at md_write_start.
>> wait_event(mddev->sb_wait,
>> !test_bit(MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING, &mddev->sb_flags) && !mddev->suspended);
>>
>>
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: INFO: task md0_reshape:23605 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: Tainted: G OE 4.13.0-rc5 #2
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: md0_reshape D 0 23605 2 0x00000080
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: Call Trace:
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: __schedule+0x28d/0x890
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: schedule+0x36/0x80
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: raid5_sync_request+0x2cf/0x370 [raid456]
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: md_do_sync+0xafe/0xee0 [md_mod]
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: md_thread+0x132/0x180 [md_mod]
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: kthread+0x109/0x140
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: ? find_pers+0x70/0x70 [md_mod]
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x150
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
>>
>> It stucks at:
>> /* Allow raid5_quiesce to complete */
>> wait_event(conf->wait_for_overlap, conf->quiesce != 2);
>>
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: INFO: task mdadm:23613 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: Tainted: G OE 4.13.0-rc5 #2
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: mdadm D 0 23613 1 0x00000080
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: Call Trace:
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: __schedule+0x28d/0x890
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: schedule+0x36/0x80
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: raid5_quiesce+0x274/0x2b0 [raid456]
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: suspend_lo_store+0x82/0xe0 [md_mod]
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: md_attr_store+0x80/0xc0 [md_mod]
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: sysfs_kf_write+0x3a/0x50
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: kernfs_fop_write+0xff/0x180
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: __vfs_write+0x37/0x170
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: ? selinux_file_permission+0xe5/0x120
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: ? security_file_permission+0x3b/0xc0
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: vfs_write+0xb2/0x1b0
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: ? syscall_trace_enter+0x1d0/0x2b0
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: SyS_write+0x55/0xc0
>> Sep 1 13:57:26 localhost kernel: do_syscall_64+0x67/0x150
>>
>> It's stuck at:
>> conf->quiesce = 2;
>> wait_event_cmd(conf->wait_for_quiescent,
>> atomic_read(&conf->active_stripes) == 0 &&
>> atomic_read(&conf->active_aligned_reads) == 0,
>> unlock_all_device_hash_locks_irq(conf),
>> lock_all_device_hash_locks_irq(conf));
>> conf->quiesce = 1;
>>
>> [root@dell-pr1700-02 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
>> Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
>> md0 : active raid5 loop6[7] loop4[6] loop5[5](S) loop3[3] loop2[2] loop1[1] loop0[0]
>> 2039808 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
>> [>....................] reshape = 0.5% (2560/509952) finish=162985.0min speed=0K/sec
>>
>> unused devices: <none>
>>
>>
>> I can reproduce this. So I add some logs by printk to check MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING of mddev->flags
>> and mddev->suspended.
>> mddev->suspend : 0
>> mddev->flags : SP CHANGE PENDING is set
>> conf->quiesce : 2
>>
>> The I echo active > /sys/block/md0/md/array_state, reshape can start and finish successfully.
>>
>> I notice there are some fixes for raid5 stuck problem. Not sure whether it's introduced by those
>> patches.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Xiao
> Thanks for the detailed report.
> All the processes that you have mentioned are waiting for
> raid5_quiesce() to complete.
> raid5_quiesce() must be waiting for either active_stripes or
> active_aligned_reads to reach zero. Most likely active_stripes.
>
> That suggests that either there is a stripe that is active and isn't
> being handled for some reason, or the accounting of active stripes has
> problems.
>
> The fact that setting the array to 'active' removes the hang is
> interesting. That would cause the threads blocked in md_write_start to
> continue, but I cannot see how that would affect active_stripes as
> threads waiting for md_write_start() never hold a stripe. Doing that
> could cause a stripe to be used, then released, which might trigger a
> wakeup that had been lost.
At first I doubt there are some active strips that haven't been handled yet.
But the process raid5d doesn't appear in calltrace. It wasn't stuck.
>
> It would be useful to see if ->active_stripes is 0 when the deadlock
> happens.
> One way to do that is to add a printk into raid5_status(). Then
> whenever you "cat /proc/mdstat" the printk will trigger and tell you the
> value of ->active_stripes.
>
> I haven't managed to reproduce this yet, or I would track it down my
> self.
Sure the testing is running again. I'll give the information later.
Regards
Xiao
>
> Thanks,
> NeilBrown
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-04 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <221835411.4473056.1504338574607.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
2017-09-02 8:01 ` Stuck in md_write_start because MD_SB_CHANGE_PENDING can't be cleared Xiao Ni
2017-09-04 2:16 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-04 2:45 ` Xiao Ni [this message]
2017-09-04 3:52 ` Xiao Ni
2017-09-04 5:34 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-04 7:36 ` Xiao Ni
2017-09-05 1:36 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-05 2:15 ` Xiao Ni
2017-09-07 1:37 ` Xiao Ni
2017-09-07 5:37 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-11 0:14 ` Xiao Ni
2017-09-11 3:36 ` NeilBrown
2017-09-11 5:03 ` Xiao Ni
2017-09-30 9:44 ` Xiao Ni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22698eb3-35f7-04e5-96e8-26470d892655@redhat.com \
--to=xni@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).