public inbox for linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "John Stoffel" <john@stoffel.org>
To: o1bigtenor <o1bigtenor@gmail.com>
Cc: John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org>,
	Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@gmail.com>,
	Linux-RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RAID types & chunks sizes for new NAS drives
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:01:47 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <24306.13691.769328.392093@quad.stoffel.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPpdf5-RWyGX4Q9qaZBDfxUXedf+MnV3wnXh6R3XSF7-LomKzQ@mail.gmail.com>

>>>>> "o1bigtenor" == o1bigtenor  <o1bigtenor@gmail.com> writes:

o1bigtenor> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 9:06 PM John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org> wrote:
>> 
o1bigtenor> snip

>> In any case, make sure you get NAS rated disks, either the newest WD
>> RED+ (or is it Blue?)  In any case, make sure to NOT get the SMR
>> (Shingled Magnetic Recording) format drives.  See previous threads in
>> this group, as well as the arstechnica.com discussion about it all
>> that they disk last month.  Very informative.
>> 
>> Personally, with regular hard disks, I still kinda think 4gb is the
>> sweet spot, since you can just mirror pairs of the disks and then
>> stripe across on top as needed.  I like my storage simple, because
>> when (not if!) it all hits the fan, simple is easier to recover from.
>> 
o1bigtenor> Did you mean 4 TB or 4 GB as you wrote?
o1bigtenor> (Somewhat of a difference I do believe.)

LOL!  I meant 4Tb of course... but I do remember when 10mb HDs were
amazing... :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-23 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-21 16:23 RAID types & chunks sizes for new NAS drives Ian Pilcher
2020-06-23  1:45 ` John Stoffel
2020-06-23  2:31   ` o1bigtenor
2020-06-23 17:01     ` John Stoffel [this message]
2020-06-24 22:13       ` o1bigtenor
2020-06-23 12:26   ` Nix
2020-06-23 18:50     ` John Stoffel
2020-06-23 15:36   ` antlists
2020-06-23 18:55     ` John Stoffel
2020-06-24 12:32     ` Phil Turmel
2020-06-24 14:49       ` John Stoffel
2020-06-24 18:41         ` Wols Lists
2020-06-23 20:27   ` Ian Pilcher
2020-06-23 21:30     ` John Stoffel
2020-06-23 23:16       ` Ian Pilcher
2020-06-24  0:34         ` John Stoffel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=24306.13691.769328.392093@quad.stoffel.home \
    --to=john@stoffel.org \
    --cc=arequipeno@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o1bigtenor@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox