From: "John Stoffel" <john@stoffel.org>
To: Wol <antlists@youngman.org.uk>
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Nothing wrong, but is my website advice wonky?
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 15:15:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24995.58211.78152.138025@quad.stoffel.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12dd9f53-aab2-c487-9663-b799c2d0e8dd@youngman.org.uk>
>>>>> "Wol" == Wol <antlists@youngman.org.uk> writes:
Wol> Problem solved! My usual problem of missing the detail...
How was the problem solved? Can you provide details on the before and
after setup? It should be trivial to test with loop back devices.
Wol> I'd described starting with a 2-drive mirror and converting it to
Wol> a 3-drive raid-5. I was actually starting with a 2-active-1-spare
Wol> mirror ...
So if you had removed the spare before hand, would it have jumped
straight to a three drive RAID 5 setup? And curious why you didn't
goto RAID6? RAID5 just makes me nervous these days, I don't trust it
since drives tend to fail in waves.
But in my home system, I also mostly just mirror (or even triple
mirror!) my important data for both speed and ease of recovery.
Wol> On 28/11/2021 09:25, Wols Lists wrote:
>> Finally upgrading my system to raid-5 - two Seagate Ironwolves and a
>> Barracuda ... :-(
>>
>> As per my own advice, I added the third drive as a spare, then grew the
>> array to raid-5 in two separate commands.
>>
>> Trying to track what's going on, "cat /proc/mdstat" just shows two
>> drives as sync'ing. "mdadm --detail" shows two active drives and a spare.
>>
>> The drives are quite clearly working away - as I would expect.
>>
>> So. What I *think* is happening is that my mirror is upgrading to a
>> 2-disk raid-5, and when that's finished it will add the spare and
>> upgrade to a full 3-disk raid-5. Does that sound right?
>>
>> What I *hoped* would happen (and thought *should* happen) was that it
>> would spot the third drive, add it, and just resync straight away to
>> full raid-5.
>>
>> So at 7 or 8hrs per pass (3TB per drive) I'm now looking at my upgrade
>> taking about 15 hours. Whoops.
>>
>> So basically, does my scenario sound right? Would have explicitly
>> changing raid-devices to 3 at the same time as converting to raid-5
>> improved matters?
>>
>> Okay, I'm going to build a new raid-testing computer in the near future
>> so testing this sort of thing will be easy, but that is predicated on me
>> finding enough time without upsetting the wife ...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Wol
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-28 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-28 9:25 Nothing wrong, but is my website advice wonky? Wols Lists
2021-11-28 16:59 ` Wol
2021-11-28 20:15 ` John Stoffel [this message]
2021-11-28 21:21 ` Wol
2021-11-29 21:48 ` John Stoffel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24995.58211.78152.138025@quad.stoffel.home \
--to=john@stoffel.org \
--cc=antlists@youngman.org.uk \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox