* Corrupted RAID 50 (aparently?) array. Help needed.
@ 2008-02-28 15:42 mella.nicolas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mella.nicolas @ 2008-02-28 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi list,
Hope someone can give me the right direction on how to resolve this.
I have 12 hard drives with RAID software. (250 GB each disk) I just know it was a 2 TB array. The old operating system which supported the array is no longer online. (just in case someone asks me to check the mdadm.conf file)
From what I can see with mdadm,is that there are 2 x RAID5 arrays of 990.72 GB each. (2 TB the whole array). So I believed that there is a RAID0 between both RAID5 arrays. Right? (RAID 50) The first RAID5 group is composed by 5 discs, all of them active. Here is the post: (all /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdc4 /dev/sdd4 /dev/sde4 /dev/sdf4 are similar and have the same UUID)
# mdadm --examine /dev/sdb4
----------------------------
/dev/sdb4:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.91.00
UUID : 48b86fc7:adbd7bbe:df7c7359:36df38af
Creation Time : Tue Apr 24 18:14:28 2007
Raid Level : raid5
Used Dev Size : 241873792 (230.67 GiB 247.68 GB)
Array Size : 967495168 (922.68 GiB 990.72 GB)
Raid Devices : 5
Total Devices : 5
Preferred Minor : 0
Reshape pos'n : 0
New Level : raid0
New Layout : left-asymmetric
New Chunksize : 0
Update Time : Mon Nov 29 21:01:33 1999
State : clean
Active Devices : 5
Working Devices : 5
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Checksum : 42da3120 - correct
Events : 0.61
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 0 3 4 0 active sync
0 0 3 4 0 active sync
1 1 22 4 1 active sync
2 2 33 4 2 active sync
3 3 34 4 3 active sync
4 4 56 4 4 active sync
---------------------
But If I try to assemble this 1st RAID5 array:
# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdc4 /dev/sdd4 /dev/sde4 /dev/sdf4
mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
Is not possible. I also try the build option:
# mdadm --build /dev/md0 -l5 -n5 --assume-clean /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdc4 /dev/sdd4 /dev/sde4 /dev/sdf4
mdadm: Raid level 5 not permitted with --build.
On the other hand there is the second RAID5 group which outputs the following:
------------------
# mdadm --examine /dev/sdg4
/dev/sdg4:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.91.00
UUID : 384bd728:158c759c:e9be7911:01187b1f
Creation Time : Tue Apr 24 18:14:48 2007
Raid Level : raid5
Used Dev Size : 241873792 (230.67 GiB 247.68 GB)
Array Size : 967495168 (922.68 GiB 990.72 GB)
Raid Devices : 5
Total Devices : 6
Preferred Minor : 1
Reshape pos'n : 0
New Level : raid0
New Layout : left-asymmetric
New Chunksize : 0
Update Time : Mon Nov 29 21:01:36 1999
State : active
Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 6
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 2
Checksum : 6eb7dc84 - correct
Events : 0.65
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 1 89 4 1 active sync
0 0 0 0 0 faulty removed
1 1 89 4 1 active sync
2 2 90 4 2 active sync
3 3 91 4 3 active sync
4 4 120 4 4 active sync
5 5 121 4 5 spare
6 6 88 4 6 spare
------------------------------------
The 2nd RAID5 group was composed by 7 disks (I believed, as shown above). 1 disks is faulty and 2 disks are spare. But even though with the remaining 4 disks I could try to assemble this RAID5, but I have the same result as with the 1st RAID5. (mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.)
Do you have any idea on how to re-assemble this RAID 50 array ?
Thanks for any advice & help.
Nicolas
PS:
# mdadm -V
mdadm - v2.6 - 21 December 2006
Linux lab-suse 2.6.16.46-0.12-smp #1 SMP Thu May 17 14:00:09 UTC 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
This message was sent on behalf of mella.nicolas@gmail.com at openSubscriber.com
http://www.opensubscriber.com/messages/linux-raid@vger.kernel.org/topic.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Corrupted RAID 50 (aparently?) array. Help needed.
@ 2008-02-28 16:04 Nicolas Mella
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Mella @ 2008-02-28 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi list,
Hope someone can give me the right direction on how to resolve this.
I have 12 hard drives with RAID software. (250 GB each disk) I just
know it was a 2 TB array. The old operating system which supported the
array is no longer online. (just in case someone asks me to check the
mdadm.conf file)
From what I can see with mdadm,is that there are 2 x RAID5 arrays of
990.72 GB each. (2 TB the whole array). So I believed that there is a
RAID0 between both RAID5 arrays. Right? (RAID50) The first RAID5 group
is composed by 5 discs, all of them active. Here is the post: (all
/dev/sdb4 /dev/sdc4 /dev/sdd4 /dev/sde4 /dev/sdf4 are similar and have
the same UUID)
# mdadm --examine /dev/sdb4
----------------------------
/dev/sdb4:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.91.00
UUID : 48b86fc7:adbd7bbe:df7c7359:36df38af
Creation Time : Tue Apr 24 18:14:28 2007
Raid Level : raid5
Used Dev Size : 241873792 (230.67 GiB 247.68 GB)
Array Size : 967495168 (922.68 GiB 990.72 GB)
Raid Devices : 5
Total Devices : 5
Preferred Minor : 0
Reshape pos'n : 0
New Level : raid0
New Layout : left-asymmetric
New Chunksize : 0
Update Time : Mon Nov 29 21:01:33 1999
State : clean
Active Devices : 5
Working Devices : 5
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Checksum : 42da3120 - correct
Events : 0.61
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 0 3 4 0 active sync
0 0 3 4 0 active sync
1 1 22 4 1 active sync
2 2 33 4 2 active sync
3 3 34 4 3 active sync
4 4 56 4 4 active sync
---------------------
But If I try to assemble this 1st RAID5 array:
# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdc4 /dev/sdd4 /dev/sde4 /dev/sdf4
mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
Is not possible. I also try the build option:
# mdadm --build /dev/md0 -l5 -n5 --assume-clean /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdc4
/dev/sdd4 /dev/sde4 /dev/sdf4
mdadm: Raid level 5 not permitted with --build.
On the other hand there is the second RAID5 group which outputs the following:
------------------
# mdadm --examine /dev/sdg4
/dev/sdg4:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.91.00
UUID : 384bd728:158c759c:e9be7911:01187b1f
Creation Time : Tue Apr 24 18:14:48 2007
Raid Level : raid5
Used Dev Size : 241873792 (230.67 GiB 247.68 GB)
Array Size : 967495168 (922.68 GiB 990.72 GB)
Raid Devices : 5
Total Devices : 6
Preferred Minor : 1
Reshape pos'n : 0
New Level : raid0
New Layout : left-asymmetric
New Chunksize : 0
Update Time : Mon Nov 29 21:01:36 1999
State : active
Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 6
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 2
Checksum : 6eb7dc84 - correct
Events : 0.65
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 1 89 4 1 active sync
0 0 0 0 0 faulty removed
1 1 89 4 1 active sync
2 2 90 4 2 active sync
3 3 91 4 3 active sync
4 4 120 4 4 active sync
5 5 121 4 5 spare
6 6 88 4 6 spare
------------------------------------
The 2nd RAID5 group was composed by 7 disks (I believed, as shown
above). 1 disks is faulty and 2 disks are spare. But even though with
the remaining 4 disks I could try to assemble the RAID5, but I have
the same result as with the 1st RAID5. (mdadm: Failed to restore
critical section for reshape, sorry.)
Do you have any idea on how to re-assemble this RAID 50 array ?
Thanks for any advice & help.
Nicolas
PS:
# mdadm -V
mdadm - v2.6 - 21 December 2006
Linux lab-suse 2.6.16.46-0.12-smp #1 SMP Thu May 17 14:00:09 UTC 2007
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Corrupted RAID 50 (aparently) array. Help needed.
@ 2008-02-28 16:15 Nicolas Mella
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Mella @ 2008-02-28 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi list,
Hope someone can give me the right direction on how to resolve this.
I have 12 hard drives with RAID software. (250 GB each disk) I just
know it was a 2 TB array. The old operating system which supported the
array is no longer online. (just in case someone asks me to check the
mdadm.conf file)
From what I can see with mdadm,is that there are 2 x RAID5 arrays of
990.72 GB each. (2 TB the whole array). So I believed that there is a
RAID0 between both RAID5 arrays. Right? (RAID50) The first RAID5 group
is composed by 5 discs, all of them active. Here is the post: (all
/dev/sdb4 /dev/sdc4 /dev/sdd4 /dev/sde4 /dev/sdf4 are similar and have
the same UUID)
# mdadm --examine /dev/sdb4
----------------------------
/dev/sdb4:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.91.00
UUID : 48b86fc7:adbd7bbe:df7c7359:36df38af
Creation Time : Tue Apr 24 18:14:28 2007
Raid Level : raid5
Used Dev Size : 241873792 (230.67 GiB 247.68 GB)
Array Size : 967495168 (922.68 GiB 990.72 GB)
Raid Devices : 5
Total Devices : 5
Preferred Minor : 0
Reshape pos'n : 0
New Level : raid0
New Layout : left-asymmetric
New Chunksize : 0
Update Time : Mon Nov 29 21:01:33 1999
State : clean
Active Devices : 5
Working Devices : 5
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Checksum : 42da3120 - correct
Events : 0.61
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 0 3 4 0 active sync
0 0 3 4 0 active sync
1 1 22 4 1 active sync
2 2 33 4 2 active sync
3 3 34 4 3 active sync
4 4 56 4 4 active sync
---------------------
But If I try to assemble this 1st RAID5 array:
# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdc4 /dev/sdd4 /dev/sde4 /dev/sdf4
mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
Is not possible. I also try the build option:
# mdadm --build /dev/md0 -l5 -n5 --assume-clean /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdc4
/dev/sdd4 /dev/sde4 /dev/sdf4
mdadm: Raid level 5 not permitted with --build.
On the other hand there is the second RAID5 group which outputs the following:
------------------
# mdadm --examine /dev/sdg4
/dev/sdg4:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.91.00
UUID : 384bd728:158c759c:e9be7911:01187b1f
Creation Time : Tue Apr 24 18:14:48 2007
Raid Level : raid5
Used Dev Size : 241873792 (230.67 GiB 247.68 GB)
Array Size : 967495168 (922.68 GiB 990.72 GB)
Raid Devices : 5
Total Devices : 6
Preferred Minor : 1
Reshape pos'n : 0
New Level : raid0
New Layout : left-asymmetric
New Chunksize : 0
Update Time : Mon Nov 29 21:01:36 1999
State : active
Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 6
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 2
Checksum : 6eb7dc84 - correct
Events : 0.65
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 1 89 4 1 active sync
0 0 0 0 0 faulty removed
1 1 89 4 1 active sync
2 2 90 4 2 active sync
3 3 91 4 3 active sync
4 4 120 4 4 active sync
5 5 121 4 5 spare
6 6 88 4 6 spare
------------------------------------
The 2nd RAID5 group was composed by 7 disks (I believed, as shown
above). 1 disks is faulty and 2 disks are spare. But even though with
the remaining 4 disks I could try to assemble the RAID5, but I have
the same result as with the 1st RAID5. (mdadm: Failed to restore
critical section for reshape, sorry.)
Do you have any idea on how to re-assemble this RAID 50 array ?
Thanks for any advice & help.
Nicolas
PS:
# mdadm -V
mdadm - v2.6 - 21 December 2006
Linux lab-suse 2.6.16.46-0.12-smp #1 SMP Thu May 17 14:00:09 UTC 2007
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Corrupted RAID 50 (aparently?) array. Help needed.
@ 2008-02-28 16:22 nmella
2008-03-01 20:31 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: nmella @ 2008-02-28 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi list,
Hope someone can give me the right direction on how to resolve this.
I have 12 hard drives with RAID software. (250 GB each disk) I just
know it was a 2 TB array. The old operating system which supported the
array is no longer online. (just in case someone asks me to check the
mdadm.conf file)
From what I can see with mdadm,is that there are 2 x RAID5 arrays of
990.72 GB each. (2 TB the whole array). So I believed that there is a
RAID0 between both RAID5 arrays. Right? (RAID50) The first RAID5 group
is composed by 5 discs, all of them active. Here is the post: (all
/dev/sdb4 /dev/sdc4 /dev/sdd4 /dev/sde4 /dev/sdf4 are similar and have
the same UUID)
# mdadm --examine /dev/sdb4
----------------------------
/dev/sdb4:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.91.00
UUID : 48b86fc7:adbd7bbe:df7c7359:36df38af
Creation Time : Tue Apr 24 18:14:28 2007
Raid Level : raid5
Used Dev Size : 241873792 (230.67 GiB 247.68 GB)
Array Size : 967495168 (922.68 GiB 990.72 GB)
Raid Devices : 5
Total Devices : 5
Preferred Minor : 0
Reshape pos'n : 0
New Level : raid0
New Layout : left-asymmetric
New Chunksize : 0
Update Time : Mon Nov 29 21:01:33 1999
State : clean
Active Devices : 5
Working Devices : 5
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Checksum : 42da3120 - correct
Events : 0.61
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 0 3 4 0 active sync
0 0 3 4 0 active sync
1 1 22 4 1 active sync
2 2 33 4 2 active sync
3 3 34 4 3 active sync
4 4 56 4 4 active sync
---------------------
But If I try to assemble this 1st RAID5 array:
# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdc4 /dev/sdd4 /dev/sde4 /dev/sdf4
mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
Is not possible. I also try the build option:
# mdadm --build /dev/md0 -l5 -n5 --assume-clean /dev/sdb4 /dev/sdc4
/dev/sdd4 /dev/sde4 /dev/sdf4
mdadm: Raid level 5 not permitted with --build.
On the other hand there is the second RAID5 group which outputs the following:
------------------
# mdadm --examine /dev/sdg4
/dev/sdg4:
Magic : a92b4efc
Version : 00.91.00
UUID : 384bd728:158c759c:e9be7911:01187b1f
Creation Time : Tue Apr 24 18:14:48 2007
Raid Level : raid5
Used Dev Size : 241873792 (230.67 GiB 247.68 GB)
Array Size : 967495168 (922.68 GiB 990.72 GB)
Raid Devices : 5
Total Devices : 6
Preferred Minor : 1
Reshape pos'n : 0
New Level : raid0
New Layout : left-asymmetric
New Chunksize : 0
Update Time : Mon Nov 29 21:01:36 1999
State : active
Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 6
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 2
Checksum : 6eb7dc84 - correct
Events : 0.65
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
this 1 89 4 1 active sync
0 0 0 0 0 faulty removed
1 1 89 4 1 active sync
2 2 90 4 2 active sync
3 3 91 4 3 active sync
4 4 120 4 4 active sync
5 5 121 4 5 spare
6 6 88 4 6 spare
------------------------------------
The 2nd RAID5 group was composed by 7 disks (I believed, as shown
above). 1 disks is faulty and 2 disks are spare. But even though with
the remaining 4 disks I could try to assemble the RAID5, but I have
the same result as with the 1st RAID5. (mdadm: Failed to restore
critical section for reshape, sorry.)
Do you have any idea on how to re-assemble this RAID 50 array ?
Thanks for any advice & help.
Nicolas
PS:
# mdadm -V
mdadm - v2.6 - 21 December 2006
Linux lab-suse 2.6.16.46-0.12-smp #1 SMP Thu May 17 14:00:09 UTC 2007
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Corrupted RAID 50 (aparently?) array. Help needed.
@ 2008-02-28 16:35 nmella
2008-02-28 20:50 ` Janek Kozicki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: nmella @ 2008-02-28 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi list,
I just could not pass my email through "mayordomo" so here is my post:
http://www.mella.cl/a.txt
Nicolas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Corrupted RAID 50 (aparently?) array. Help needed.
2008-02-28 16:35 nmella
@ 2008-02-28 20:50 ` Janek Kozicki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Janek Kozicki @ 2008-02-28 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nmella; +Cc: linux-raid
nmella@kepler.cl said: (by the date of Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:35:18 -0600)
> Hi list,
>
> I just could not pass my email through "mayordomo" so here is my post:
>
> http://www.mella.cl/a.txt
well, I received this post, like, four times already.
--
Janek Kozicki |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Corrupted RAID 50 (aparently?) array. Help needed.
2008-02-28 16:22 Corrupted RAID 50 (aparently?) " nmella
@ 2008-03-01 20:31 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-03-03 0:28 ` Nicolas Mella
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2008-03-01 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nmella; +Cc: linux-raid
nmella@kepler.cl wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Hope someone can give me the right direction on how to resolve this.
Were you under the impression that this list is a professional service
where people are paid to give you good response? You sent the first copy
of your question at 10:42, got impatient and resent at 11:04, then 11:15
and 11:22. Sorry we don't respond fast enough for you, perhaps you
should take your business elsewhere.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Corrupted RAID 50 (aparently?) array. Help needed.
2008-03-01 20:31 ` Bill Davidsen
@ 2008-03-03 0:28 ` Nicolas Mella
2008-03-03 17:42 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Mella @ 2008-03-03 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> wrote:
> nmella@kepler.cl wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > Hope someone can give me the right direction on how to resolve this.
>
> Were you under the impression that this list is a professional service
> where people are paid to give you good response? You sent the first copy
> of your question at 10:42, got impatient and resent at 11:04, then 11:15
> and 11:22. Sorry we don't respond fast enough for you, perhaps you
> should take your business elsewhere.
>
> --
> Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
> "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
> be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark
Sorry list. I know my mistake and I am totally embarrassed.....
I just read everywhere that majordomo filter almost everything....so I
thought my emails where been filtered.... (list emails are dispatch
with a very long delay).
Sorry.
For sure I don't think this is a professional service. I just wanted
help on my problem which this list seem to be the right solution.
Well, anyway I could re-assemble the RAID myself.
If is it useful for someone here goes the solution:
Using Winhex software, I assemble both RAID5 groups considering the
sequence that was detail by the "mdadm --examine option". (RAID5 type
AMI backward dynamic)
Having both 1,0 TB disks the Testdisk program said they had LVM partion.
So I activated them using "vgscan" and "vgchange -a y" and then I just
mount the partion. ufffff
Sorry for all the trouble.
Have a nice day.
Nicolas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Corrupted RAID 50 (aparently?) array. Help needed.
2008-03-03 0:28 ` Nicolas Mella
@ 2008-03-03 17:42 ` Bill Davidsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bill Davidsen @ 2008-03-03 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Mella; +Cc: linux-raid
Nicolas Mella wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> wrote:
>
>> nmella@kepler.cl wrote:
>> > Hi list,
>> >
>> > Hope someone can give me the right direction on how to resolve this.
>>
>> Were you under the impression that this list is a professional service
>> where people are paid to give you good response? You sent the first copy
>> of your question at 10:42, got impatient and resent at 11:04, then 11:15
>> and 11:22. Sorry we don't respond fast enough for you, perhaps you
>> should take your business elsewhere.
>>
>> --
>> Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
>> "Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
>> be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark
>>
>
>
> Sorry list. I know my mistake and I am totally embarrassed.....
>
> I just read everywhere that majordomo filter almost everything....so I
> thought my emails where been filtered.... (list emails are dispatch
> with a very long delay).
>
> Sorry.
>
> For sure I don't think this is a professional service. I just wanted
> help on my problem which this list seem to be the right solution.
>
> Well, anyway I could re-assemble the RAID myself.
>
>
Did you try just specifying "partitions" to mdadm and letting the
software determine the members and assembly order? While this is not as
exciting a challenge as assembling with data from examined partitions,
it is a lot more convenient. ;-)
> If is it useful for someone here goes the solution:
>
> Using Winhex software, I assemble both RAID5 groups considering the
> sequence that was detail by the "mdadm --examine option". (RAID5 type
> AMI backward dynamic)
>
> Having both 1,0 TB disks the Testdisk program said they had LVM partion.
>
> So I activated them using "vgscan" and "vgchange -a y" and then I just
> mount the partion. ufffff
>
>
Good job, glad you got it going again.
> Sorry for all the trouble.
>
> Have a nice day.
>
> Nicolas
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-03 17:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-28 15:42 Corrupted RAID 50 (aparently?) array. Help needed mella.nicolas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-02-28 16:04 Nicolas Mella
2008-02-28 16:15 Corrupted RAID 50 (aparently) " Nicolas Mella
2008-02-28 16:22 Corrupted RAID 50 (aparently?) " nmella
2008-03-01 20:31 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-03-03 0:28 ` Nicolas Mella
2008-03-03 17:42 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-02-28 16:35 nmella
2008-02-28 20:50 ` Janek Kozicki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).