Linux RAID subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus <M4rkusXXL@web.de>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: future of raid 6
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 20:28:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2811558.CnJCJrJZ21@markus> (raw)

Hello!

I have one question (maybe more) regarding the raid development. Especially 
raid 6 and better.
I read in some articles[1] that raid 6 will become worse as the size of the 
disks grow but the (unrecoverable) error rate and data rate do not improve as 
much. (Rebuilds are likely to hit an unrecoverable error, not to mention the 
long time it will take to rebuild raids with +10TB per drive.)
They estimated 2019 (that was written ten years ago).

Is there already something in progress for the md-raid in linux kernel?
	If so what and where?
	If not, why? Is it not needed yet? Is md-raid itself depreciated?
	What is the future for redundant mass storage?


Best regards,
Markus


[1] http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1670144


             reply	other threads:[~2017-09-03 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-03 18:28 Markus [this message]
2017-09-03 21:03 ` future of raid 6 Wols Lists
2017-09-03 21:53   ` Gandalf Corvotempesta
2017-09-04  9:53 ` Andreas Klauer
2017-09-04 12:28   ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2017-09-05  3:44   ` Phil Turmel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2811558.CnJCJrJZ21@markus \
    --to=m4rkusxxl@web.de \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox