linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jes Sorensen <jes.sorensen@gmail.com>
To: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@redhat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [mdadm PATCH] Create: tell udev md device is not ready when first created.
Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 10:45:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <28a2c94d-7f70-147a-9909-c1e4de6cc335@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2fb51c71-4398-e206-4a94-5dcd13d78603@redhat.com>

On 05/03/2017 10:32 AM, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
> On 05/02/2017 03:42 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> On 04/28/2017 01:05 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>
>>> When an array is created the content is not initialized,
>>> so it could have remnants of an old filesystem or md array
>>> etc on it.
>>> udev will see this and might try to activate it, which is almost
>>> certainly not what is wanted.
>>>
>>> So create a mechanism for mdadm to communicate with udev to tell
>>> it that the device isn't ready.  This mechanism is the existance
>>> of a file /run/mdadm/created-mdXXX where mdXXX is the md device name.
>>>
>>> When creating an array, mdadm will create the file.
>>> A new udev rule file, 01-md-raid-creating.rules, will detect the
>>> precense of thst file and set ENV{SYSTEMD_READY}="0".
>>> This is fairly uniformly used to suppress actions based on the
>>> contents of the device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
>>> ---
>>>  Assemble.c                  |  2 +-
>>>  Build.c                     |  2 +-
>>>  Create.c                    |  9 +++++++-
>>>  Incremental.c               |  4 ++--
>>>  Makefile                    |  4 ++--
>>>  lib.c                       | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  mdadm.h                     |  4 +++-
>>>  mdopen.c                    | 52
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>  udev-md-raid-creating.rules |  7 ++++++
>>>  9 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 udev-md-raid-creating.rules
>>
>> Applied!
>>
>
> How is this solving the problem then? The patch is flagging a device as
> not ready, then clearing the flag after some time. Where does the wiping
> happen actually?

There is *NO* wiping happening, there is *NO* wiping going to happen.

Can we stop this nonsense now!

Thank you!
Jes



  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-03 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-20  2:40 [mdadm PATCH 0/4] Assorted mdadm patches NeilBrown
2017-04-20  2:40 ` [mdadm PATCH 1/4] Grow_continue_command: ensure 'content' is properly initialised NeilBrown
2017-04-20 16:56   ` Jes Sorensen
2017-04-20  2:40 ` [mdadm PATCH 2/4] systemd/mdadm-last-resort: use ConditionPathExists instead of Conflicts NeilBrown
2017-04-20 16:57   ` Jes Sorensen
2017-04-20  2:40 ` [mdadm PATCH 3/4] Detail: ensure --export names are acceptable as shell variables NeilBrown
2017-04-20 16:59   ` Jes Sorensen
2017-04-20  2:40 ` [mdadm PATCH 4/4] Create: tell udev device is not ready when first created NeilBrown
2017-04-20 17:29   ` Jes Sorensen
2017-04-20 21:35     ` NeilBrown
2017-04-26 10:19       ` Peter Rajnoha
2017-04-28  3:55         ` NeilBrown
2017-04-28  9:08           ` Peter Rajnoha
2017-05-01  4:35             ` [dm-devel] " NeilBrown
2017-05-02 11:40               ` Peter Rajnoha
2017-05-02 13:40                 ` Jes Sorensen
2017-05-03 14:27                   ` Peter Rajnoha
2017-05-03 14:41                     ` Jes Sorensen
2017-05-02 21:42                 ` NeilBrown
2017-04-28  5:05         ` [mdadm PATCH] Create: tell udev md " NeilBrown
2017-04-28  9:28           ` Peter Rajnoha
2017-05-02 13:32             ` Jes Sorensen
2017-05-03 14:13               ` Peter Rajnoha
2017-05-03 14:44                 ` Jes Sorensen
2017-05-06 16:25                 ` Wols Lists
2017-05-06 19:50                   ` Phil Turmel
2017-05-09 11:57                   ` Peter Rajnoha
2017-05-09 12:14                   ` Peter Rajnoha
2017-05-02 13:42           ` Jes Sorensen
2017-05-03 14:32             ` Peter Rajnoha
2017-05-03 14:45               ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2017-05-04 10:58           ` Peter Rajnoha
2017-05-05  5:16             ` [mdadm PATCH] Fix typo in new udev rule NeilBrown
2017-05-05 15:07               ` Jes Sorensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=28a2c94d-7f70-147a-9909-c1e4de6cc335@gmail.com \
    --to=jes.sorensen@gmail.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=prajnoha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).