linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
To: David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Cc: Linux Raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm>
Subject: Re: Checksumming RAID?
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:09:30 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2920513.16.1354021770710.JavaMail.root@zimbra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B4B40B.3000807@hesbynett.no>

> One way to handle this at md block level would be to have an option
> for
> raid arrays to always do a full stripe read and consistency check
> whenever a block is read. If the consistency check fails (without any
> errors being indicated from the drives), the array should simply
> return
> a read error - it should /not/ attempt to recover the data (since it
> can't tell which parts are the real problem). If arrays with this
> option are used as first-level arrays, with a "normal" md raid array
> (raid1, raid5, etc.) on top, then the normal raid recovery process
> will
> replace the bad data and initiate a new write to correct the
> undetected
> read error. I think this would perhaps give you the level of
> reliability you are looking for, and be suitable for big arrays
> (indeed,
> it would be unsuitable for small arrays as you need at least two
> levels).

If this system is running RAID-6, recovery should be possible to check both parity chunks, right?

Vennlige hilsener / Best regards

roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
roy@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med xenotyp etymologi. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-27 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-26 13:27 Checksumming RAID? Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-11-27  9:45 ` David Brown
2012-11-27 10:17   ` Bernd Schubert
2012-11-27 11:20     ` David Brown
2012-11-27 11:39       ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-11-27 12:37         ` David Brown
2012-11-27 13:09           ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [this message]
2012-11-27 13:20             ` David Brown
2012-11-27 13:56               ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-11-27 14:34                 ` David Brown
2012-11-27 20:49           ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-11-28 10:58             ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-11-27 12:31       ` Bernd Schubert
2012-11-27 13:05         ` David Brown
2012-11-27 18:53           ` Chris Murphy
2012-11-27 19:27             ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-11-27 19:50               ` Chris Murphy
2012-11-28 10:56                 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-11-28 10:59                   ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-11-28 13:25                   ` Drew
2012-11-28 17:51                     ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-11-28 19:16                       ` Chris Murphy
2012-11-28 19:08                   ` Chris Murphy
2012-11-28 19:18                     ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-11-28 20:02                       ` Chris Murphy
2012-11-27 13:54       ` Joe Landman
2012-11-27 18:48   ` Chris Murphy
2012-11-27 19:36     ` Chris Murphy
2012-12-03 12:24 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-12-03 14:09   ` Checksumming RAID? / SCSI SAS T10 PI and DIF/DIX / T13 SATA EPP Pasi Kärkkäinen
2012-12-05 19:05     ` Martin K. Petersen
2012-12-06 11:10       ` John Robinson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2920513.16.1354021770710.JavaMail.root@zimbra \
    --to=roy@karlsbakk.net \
    --cc=bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=david.brown@hesbynett.no \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).