From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>
To: stan@hardwarefreak.com
Cc: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Disk speed comparison
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 06:29:39 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2944870.0.1356240579079.JavaMail.root@zimbra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50D68FC0.70807@hardwarefreak.com>
> > I have an array with 6 2TB drives plus a spare. While this works
> > well, I can from the munin graphs at
> > http://munin.karlsbakk.net/munin/karlsbakk.net/smilla.karlsbakk.net/index.html
> > that the WD2001FASS drives (sd[bcfg]) perform some 30% better than
> > the Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 drives (sd[eh]). The drives are on a
> > mixed set of controllers, so this shouldn't be relevant. Since they
> > all are specified to spin on 7200RPM, I find it wierd that the
> > performance difference shown by the Munin graph is so big.
>
> You've provided zero information about the controllers or the
> configuration of the drives. If the SATA ASIC to which the Black
> drives
> are connected is AHCI and the other is not, then NCQ may account for
> the
> difference in performance. Or, both may currently be AHCI, but
> possibly
> the Hitachi drives perform better with NCQ disabled. This would not be
> rare. If you laid partitions on the Hitachi drives and misaligned
> them,
> this could easily cause a 30% deficit. Etc, etc.
>
> I doubt there is a 30% overall performance difference between these
> two
> drive models. The Black models are "enthusiast" class drives, and do
> have some additional performance features, but not that I'd think
> would
> yield a 30% advantage.
>
> You need to dig deeper into the details.
no partitions on this setup, just plain drives. what munin tells me is those WD drives are rather faster than the hitachis. As noted, all drives are on a mixed controller setup, the hitachis and wd drives share controllers for some. the only known common factor for the slow and fast drives are their label.
--
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 98013356
roy@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
GPG Public key: http://karlsbakk.net/roysigurdkarlsbakk.pubkey.txt
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med xenotyp etymologi. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-23 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-22 17:39 Disk speed comparison Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-12-22 17:44 ` Roger Heflin
2012-12-22 17:49 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-12-22 17:53 ` Roger Heflin
2012-12-22 18:07 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2012-12-23 0:11 ` Roger Heflin
2012-12-23 4:59 ` Stan Hoeppner
2012-12-23 5:29 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [this message]
2012-12-23 22:04 ` Stan Hoeppner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2944870.0.1356240579079.JavaMail.root@zimbra \
--to=roy@karlsbakk.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stan@hardwarefreak.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).