From: BERNARD JOHN ZOLP <bjzolp@students.wisc.edu>
To: Guy <bugzilla@watkins-home.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RE: RAID5 Not coming back up after crash
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:56:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30b0335be6.35be630b03@wiscmail.wisc.edu> (raw)
Just a few follow up questions before I dive into this. Will mdadm work
with a RAID setup created with the older raidtools package that came
with my SuSE installation?
Assuming the drive with bad blocks is not getting worse, dont think it
is -- but you never know, could I map them out by writing to those
sectors with dd and then running the command to bring the array back
online? Or should I wait for the RMA of the flakey drive and dd_rescue
to the new one and bring that up?
Thanks again,
bjz
----- Original Message -----
From: Guy <bugzilla@watkins-home.com>
Date: Monday, November 29, 2004 11:40 am
Subject: RE: RAID5 Not coming back up after crash
> You can recover, but not with bad blocks.
>
> This command should get your array back on-line:
> mdadm -A /dev/md0 --force /dev/hda1 /dev/hdc1 /dev/hdd1 /dev/hdi1
> /dev/hdj1
> But, as soon as md reads a bad block it will fail the disk and your
> arraywill be off-line.
>
> If you have an extra disk, you could attempt to copy the disk
> first, then
> replace the disk with the read error with the copy.
>
> dd_rescue can copy a disk with read errors.
>
> Also, it is common for a disk to grow bad spots over time. These
> bad spots
> (sectors) can be re-mapped by the drive to a spare sector. This re-
> mappingwill occur when an attempt is made to write to the bad
> sector. So, you can
> repair your disk by writing to the bad sectors. But, be careful
> not to
> overwrite good data. I have done this using dd. First I found the
> badsector with dd, then I wrote to the 1 bad sector with dd. I
> would need to
> refer to the man page to do it again, so I can't explain it here at
> thistime. It is not really hard, but 1 small mistake, and "that's
> it man, game
> over man, game over".
>
> Guy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of B. J. Zolp
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 11:33 AM
> To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RAID5 Not coming back up after crash
>
> I have a RAID5 setup on my fileserver using disks hda1 hdb1 hdc1
> hdd1
> hdi1 and hdj1. Yesterday I started moving a large chunk of files
> ~80GB
> from this array to a stand alone drive in the system and about
> halfway
> through the mv I got a ton of PERMISSION DENIED errors some of the
> remaining files left to be moved and the move process quit. I did
> a ls
> of the raid directory and got PERMISSION DENIED on the same files
> that
> errored out on the mv while some of the other files looked fine. I
> figured it might be a good idea to take the raid down and back up
> again
> (probably a mistake) and I could not reboot the machine without
> physically turning it off as some processes were hung. Upon
> booting
> back up, the raid did not come online stating that hdj1 was kicked
> due
> to inconsistency. Additionally hdb1 is listed as offline too. So
> I
> have 2 drives that are not cooperating. I have a hunch hdb1 might
> have
> not been working for some time.
>
> I found some info stating that if you mark the drive that failed
> first
> as "failed-drive" and try a "mkraid --force --dangerous-no-resync
> /dev/md0" then I might have some luck getting my files back. From
> my
> logs I can see that all the working drives have event counter:
> 00000022
> and hdj1 has event counter: 00000021 and hdb1 has event counter:
> 00000001. Does this mean that hdb1 failed a log time ago or is
> this
> difference in event counters likely within a few minutes fo each
> other?
> I just ran badblocks on both hdb1 and hdj1 and found 1 bad block on
> hdb1
> and about 15 on hdj1, would that be enough to cause my raid to get
> this
> out of whack? In any case I plan to replace those drives, but
> would the
> method above be the best route once I have copied the raw data to
> the
> new drives in order to bring my raid back up?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> bjz
>
> here is my log from when I run raidstart /dev/md0:
>
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: [events: 00000022]
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion last message repeated 3 times
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: [events: 00000021]
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: autorun ...
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: considering hdj1 ...
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: adding hdj1 ...
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: adding hdi1 ...
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: adding hdd1 ...
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: adding hdc1 ...
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: adding hda1 ...
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: created md0
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: bind<hda1,1>
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: bind<hdc1,2>
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: bind<hdd1,3>
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: bind<hdi1,4>
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: bind<hdj1,5>
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: running:
> <hdj1><hdi1><hdd1><hdc1><hda1>Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md:
> hdj1's event counter: 00000021
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: hdi1's event counter: 00000022
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: hdd1's event counter: 00000022
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: hdc1's event counter: 00000022
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: hda1's event counter: 00000022
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: superblock update time
> inconsistency
> -- using the most recent one
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: freshest: hdi1
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md0: kicking faulty hdj1!
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: unbind<hdj1,4>
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: export_rdev(hdj1)
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: md0: raid array is not clean --
> starting background reconstruction
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md0: max total readahead window set
> to 2560k
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md0: 5 data-disks, max readahead per
> data-disk: 512k
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: raid5: device hdi1 operational as
> raid disk 4
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: raid5: device hdd1 operational as
> raid disk 3
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: raid5: device hdc1 operational as
> raid disk 2
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: raid5: device hda1 operational as
> raid disk 0
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: raid5: not enough operational devices
> for
> md0 (2/6 failed)
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: RAID5 conf printout:
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: --- rd:6 wd:4 fd:2
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: disk 0, s:0, o:1, n:0 rd:0 us:1
> dev:hda1Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: disk 1, s:0, o:0, n:1 rd:1
> us:1 dev:[dev
> 00:00]
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: disk 2, s:0, o:1, n:2 rd:2 us:1
> dev:hdc1Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: disk 3, s:0, o:1, n:3 rd:3
> us:1 dev:hdd1
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: disk 4, s:0, o:1, n:4 rd:4 us:1
> dev:hdi1Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: disk 5, s:0, o:0, n:5 rd:5
> us:1 dev:[dev
> 00:00]
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: raid5: failed to run raid set md0
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: pers->run() failed ...
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md :do_md_run() returned -22
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: md0 stopped.
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: unbind<hdi1,3>
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: export_rdev(hdi1)
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: unbind<hdd1,2>
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: export_rdev(hdd1)
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: unbind<hdc1,1>
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: export_rdev(hdc1)
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: unbind<hda1,0>
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: export_rdev(hda1)
> Nov 29 10:10:19 orion kernel: md: ... autorun DONE.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
> raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.4.3 - Release Date: 11/26/2004
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
> raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next reply other threads:[~2004-11-29 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-29 20:56 BERNARD JOHN ZOLP [this message]
2004-11-29 22:29 ` RE: RAID5 Not coming back up after crash Guy
2004-11-30 5:38 ` B. J. Zolp
2004-11-30 5:45 ` Neil Brown
2004-11-30 5:48 ` B. J. Zolp
2004-11-30 5:54 ` Neil Brown
2004-11-30 6:33 ` THANKS!! was:Re: " B. J. Zolp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30b0335be6.35be630b03@wiscmail.wisc.edu \
--to=bjzolp@students.wisc.edu \
--cc=bugzilla@watkins-home.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).