From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mateusz Korniak Subject: Re: force remapping a pending sector in sw raid5 array Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 11:43:12 +0100 Message-ID: <3275011.qXpCPUrKDu@matkor-lenovo> References: <20180206181416.amo6geclrvc6ylrf@merlins.org> <1934212.TzpEgCIeIR@matkor-lenovo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Phil Turmel Cc: Marc MERLIN , Kay Diederichs , Andreas Klauer , Adam Goryachev , Roger Heflin , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On Sunday 11 of February 2018 12:13:45 Phil Turmel wrote: > On 02/10/2018 04:43 PM, Mateusz Korniak wrote: > > > data is saved under different location when such write fails for > > later reads? >=20 > No. (...) So having arrays having non-empty BBL members means that array is in fa= ct=20 degraded (for tiny part, but still), right? Is there any option for mdadm --monitor to send warning e-mail when bbl= entry=20 is added? (I can't see anything regarding bbl in mdadm --monitor sectio= n) ? --=20 Mateusz Korniak "(...) mam brata - powa=C5=BCny, domator, liczykrupa, hipokryta, pobo=C5= =BCni=C5=9B, =09kr=C3=B3tko m=C3=B3wi=C4=85c - podpora spo=C5=82ecze=C5=84stwa." =09=09=09=09Nikos Kazantzakis - "Grek Zorba"