From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: md/raid1: Improve another size determination in setup_conf() Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:20:51 +0200 Message-ID: <38308e94-5495-8433-25dc-51d7b1f76948@users.sourceforge.net> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <786843ef-4b6f-eb04-7326-2f6f5b408826@users.sourceforge.net> <9831fce9-d689-89e4-dec8-50cadcd13fdd@users.sourceforge.net> <20161007075345.GB6039@mwanda> <77d68bcd-1ae4-4808-fc0b-6183ae5fb6c4@users.sourceforge.net> <10ff33b4-44f0-eaea-8549-79a6ba250a2a@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jes Sorensen Cc: Dan Carpenter , Richard Weinberger , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , Guoqing Jiang , Jens Axboe , Mike Christie , Neil Brown , Shaohua Li , Tomasz Majchrzak , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall List-Id: linux-raid.ids >> Can it "accidentally" happen that some of them will be really worth >> also for your precious software development attention? > > Given that none of your patches fix any real bugs Are there any ones which would eventually become "real" also for you? > and you do your best to ignore any guidance you have been given, I dare occasionally to find reasons out for a specific disagreement. > I do reject your entire patchset and you can consider this a NACK for this entire series. Thanks for your feedback. I am still curious if any other software developers or source code reviewers would dare to express an other opinion for one of the shown update possibilities. Regards, Markus