From: hank peng <pengxihan@gmail.com>
To: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: about raid5 recovery when created
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 21:49:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <389deec70912080549h1b22489es612235ad29354d6b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091208131446.GA21130@cthulhu.home.robinhill.me.uk>
2009/12/8 Robin Hill <robin@robinhill.me.uk>:
> On Tue Dec 08, 2009 at 09:01:23PM +0800, hank peng wrote:
>
>> Hi, all:
>> As we know, when a raid5 array is created, recovery will be going on
>> which involves some read, one xor and one write. Since there is no
>> real data in the disk at the time, besides, if I am willing to wait
>> for recovery to complete and then use this raid5, how about adding
>> support for a fast recovery method? Right now, what is in my mind is
>> zero all disks which belong to this raid5. I think it will increase
>> raid5 recovery speed when created and decrease CPU usage, since all
>> zero is also XORed.
>> What do raid developers think?
>>
> It'll decrease CPU usage but increase I/O - you're now needing to write
> to all disks. Most systems will be I/O limited rather than CPU limited,
> so the current approach works better. If you want to zero the disks
> then do this before creating the array - you can then use --assume-clean
> to skip the resync process.
>
I think --assume-clean is used mostly when doing performance test and
can't be used when creating a raid5 array using new disk, because
later read and write operation make assumption that all stripe is
XORed. Correct me if I am wrong.
> Cheers,
> Robin
> --
> ___
> ( ' } | Robin Hill <robin@robinhill.me.uk> |
> / / ) | Little Jim says .... |
> // !! | "He fallen in de water !!" |
>
--
The simplest is not all best but the best is surely the simplest!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-08 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-08 13:01 about raid5 recovery when created hank peng
2009-12-08 13:14 ` Robin Hill
2009-12-08 13:49 ` hank peng [this message]
2009-12-08 13:56 ` Robin Hill
2009-12-08 14:03 ` hank peng
2009-12-09 8:30 ` Michael Evans
2009-12-09 11:29 ` hank peng
2009-12-10 1:43 ` Neil Brown
2009-12-10 3:34 ` Michael Evans
2009-12-10 3:59 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <g3143w7eigolu0x2ziUYAxe124vaj_firegpg@mail.gmail.com>
2009-12-30 2:55 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <389deec70912090330l73d04696v1d23dbe74423d15b@mail.gmail.com>
2009-12-09 23:29 ` Michael Evans
2009-12-08 13:52 ` hank peng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=389deec70912080549h1b22489es612235ad29354d6b@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pengxihan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).