From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Xiao Ni Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] RFC: attempt to remove md deadlocks with metadata without Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 03:57:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <393232447.10845976.1505375841983.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <150518076229.32691.13542756562323866921.stgit@noble> <1403889957.10216459.1505268710452.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <1025458651.10368123.1505315351335.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <87o9qe9p3j.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <446747392.10694917.1505364915884.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> <871sn9alrh.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <871sn9alrh.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: NeilBrown Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids ----- Original Message ----- > From: "NeilBrown" > To: "Xiao Ni" > Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 1:32:02 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] RFC: attempt to remove md deadlocks with metadata without > > On Thu, Sep 14 2017, Xiao Ni wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "NeilBrown" > >> To: "Xiao Ni" > >> Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org > >> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 7:05:20 AM > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] RFC: attempt to remove md deadlocks with metadata > >> without > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 13 2017, Xiao Ni wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi Neil > >> > > >> > Sorry for the bad news. The test is still running and it's stuck again. > >> > >> Any details? Anything at all? Just a little hint maybe? > >> > >> Just saying "it's stuck again" is very nearly useless. > >> > > Hi Neil > > > > It doesn't show any useful information in /var/log/messages > > > > echo file raid5.c +p > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control > > There aren't any messages too. > > > > It looks like another problem. > > > > [root@dell-pr1700-02 ~]# ps auxf | grep D > > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > > root 8381 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? D Sep13 0:00 \_ > > [kworker/u8:1] > > root 8966 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? D Sep13 0:00 \_ > > [jbd2/md0-8] > > root 824 0.0 0.1 216856 8492 ? Ss Sep03 0:06 > > /usr/bin/abrt-watch-log -F BUG: WARNING: at WARNING: CPU: INFO: possible > > recursive locking detected ernel BUG at list_del corruption list_add > > corruption do_IRQ: stack overflow: ear stack overflow (cur: eneral > > protection fault nable to handle kernel ouble fault: RTNL: assertion > > failed eek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! adness at NETDEV WATCHDOG > > ysctl table check failed : nobody cared IRQ handler type mismatch Machine > > Check Exception: Machine check events logged divide error: bounds: > > coprocessor segment overrun: invalid TSS: segment not present: invalid > > opcode: alignment check: stack segment: fpu exception: simd exception: > > iret exception: /var/log/messages -- /usr/bin/abrt-dump-oops -xtD > > root 836 0.0 0.0 195052 3200 ? Ssl Sep03 0:00 > > /usr/sbin/gssproxy -D > > root 1225 0.0 0.0 106008 7436 ? Ss Sep03 0:00 > > /usr/sbin/sshd -D > > root 12411 0.0 0.0 112672 2264 pts/0 S+ 00:50 0:00 > > \_ grep --color=auto D > > root 8987 0.0 0.0 109000 2728 pts/2 D+ Sep13 0:04 > > \_ dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/md_test/testfile bs=1M count=1000 > > root 8983 0.0 0.0 7116 2080 ? Ds Sep13 0:00 > > /usr/sbin/mdadm --grow --continue /dev/md0 > > > > [root@dell-pr1700-02 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat > > Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] > > md0 : active raid5 loop6[7] loop4[6] loop5[5](S) loop3[3] loop2[2] loop1[1] > > loop0[0] > > 2039808 blocks super 1.2 level 5, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] > > [UUUUUU] > > [>....................] reshape = 0.0% (1/509952) finish=1059.5min > > speed=7K/sec > > > > unused devices: > > > > > > It looks like the reshape doesn't start. This time I didn't add the codes > > to check > > the information of mddev->suspended and active_stripes. I just added the > > patches > > to source codes. Do you have other suggestions to check more things? > > > > Best Regards > > Xiao > > What do > cat /proc/8987/stack > cat /proc/8983/stack > cat /proc/8966/stack > cat /proc/8381/stack > > show?? dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/md_test/testfile bs=1M count=1000 [root@dell-pr1700-02 ~]# cat /proc/8987/stack [] io_schedule+0x16/0x40 [] __lock_page+0x10e/0x160 [] mpage_prepare_extent_to_map+0x290/0x310 [ext4] [] ext4_writepages+0x467/0xe80 [ext4] [] do_writepages+0x1c/0x70 [] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xc6/0x100 [] filemap_flush+0x1c/0x20 [] ext4_alloc_da_blocks+0x2c/0x70 [ext4] [] ext4_release_file+0x79/0xc0 [ext4] [] __fput+0xe7/0x210 [] ____fput+0xe/0x10 [] task_work_run+0x83/0xb0 [] exit_to_usermode_loop+0x6c/0xa8 [] do_syscall_64+0x13a/0x150 [] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 [] 0xffffffffffffffff /usr/sbin/mdadm --grow --continue /dev/md0. Is it the reason to add lockdep_assert_held(&mddev->reconfig_mutex)? [root@dell-pr1700-02 ~]# cat /proc/8983/stack [] mddev_suspend+0x12c/0x160 [md_mod] [] suspend_lo_store+0x7c/0xe0 [md_mod] [] md_attr_store+0x80/0xc0 [md_mod] [] sysfs_kf_write+0x3a/0x50 [] kernfs_fop_write+0xff/0x180 [] __vfs_write+0x37/0x170 [] vfs_write+0xb2/0x1b0 [] SyS_write+0x55/0xc0 [] do_syscall_64+0x67/0x150 [] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 [] 0xffffffffffffffff [jbd2/md0-8] [root@dell-pr1700-02 ~]# cat /proc/8966/stack [] md_write_start+0xf0/0x220 [md_mod] [] raid5_make_request+0x89/0x8b0 [raid456] [] md_make_request+0xf5/0x260 [md_mod] [] generic_make_request+0x117/0x2f0 [] submit_bio+0x75/0x150 [] submit_bh_wbc+0x140/0x170 [] submit_bh+0x13/0x20 [] jbd2_write_superblock+0x109/0x230 [jbd2] [] jbd2_journal_update_sb_log_tail+0x3b/0x80 [jbd2] [] jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x16ef/0x19e0 [jbd2] [] kjournald2+0xd2/0x260 [jbd2] [] kthread+0x109/0x140 [] ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30 [] 0xffffffffffffffff [kworker/u8:1] [root@dell-pr1700-02 ~]# cat /proc/8381/stack [] md_make_request+0xb1/0x260 [md_mod] [] generic_make_request+0x117/0x2f0 [] submit_bio+0x75/0x150 [] ext4_io_submit+0x4c/0x60 [ext4] [] ext4_bio_write_page+0x1a4/0x3b0 [ext4] [] mpage_submit_page+0x57/0x70 [ext4] [] mpage_map_and_submit_buffers+0x168/0x290 [ext4] [] ext4_writepages+0x852/0xe80 [ext4] [] do_writepages+0x1c/0x70 [] __writeback_single_inode+0x45/0x320 [] writeback_sb_inodes+0x280/0x570 [] __writeback_inodes_wb+0x8c/0xc0 [] wb_writeback+0x276/0x310 [] wb_workfn+0x19c/0x3b0 [] process_one_work+0x149/0x360 [] worker_thread+0x4d/0x3c0 [] kthread+0x109/0x140 [] ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30 [] 0xffffffffffffffff If they can't give useful hints, I can try to print more information and do test again. Best Regards Xiao > > NeilBrown >