From: Vladimir Milovanovic <vlad@webmail.co.za>
To: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Tiobench results LOWER with more threads
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:20:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DABCFE7.9070701@webmail.co.za> (raw)
OK, just joined the list and rad the faq, and something caught my eye.
Tiobench results are apparently supposed to INCREASE when there are more
threads.
What I have is Tiobench results decreasing with more threads. This is my
setup:
Celeron 633
196 MB PC 133
Adaptec 29160 SCSI controller (PCI)
5 IBM Ultrastar 18XP (18gig, SCSI-3) disks hanging off the Adaptec
controller
Red Hat 7.3 Linux (2.4.18-3)
Experimenting with different RAID configurations, I have found that I
can not get more than 32 MB/s from this array with 4 disks, one spare. I
have actually found out that the disks set the SCSI bus at 40 MB/s
(since the disks are old) and that in RAID 0 it scales well, the speed
doubles for two disks, and then the third disk brings in a little more
performance, and then things topp off at 32 MB/s with four disks. Adding
the fifth disk gains no extra performance.
Apparently VIA chipsets have problems with PCI bursting, so that is why
I can't see the full 40 MB/s. That's fine.
But, my tests with tiobench also show that performance decreases as
extra threads are added. I am testing with a file of 800 MB (approx. 4x
size of RAM, to get meaningful results) and the decrease with threads,
while READING only, is consistent in all RAID levels. The write
performance will sometimes increase, sometimes stay the same.
WHY is this happening? Is it something I have not set up right , or
what? I am not so much interested in getting more speed out of these old
disks, they are gonna be replaced soon anyway, but I REALLY want to know
WHY is this??
Can anyone give me any pointers?
Thanks,
Vlad.
next reply other threads:[~2002-10-15 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-15 8:20 Vladimir Milovanovic [this message]
2002-10-17 21:50 ` Tiobench results LOWER with more threads Jakob Oestergaard
2002-10-18 2:31 ` Gregory Leblanc
2002-10-18 2:52 ` Maurice Hilarius
2002-10-18 7:48 ` Vladimir Milovanovic
2002-10-18 11:19 ` Jakob Oestergaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DABCFE7.9070701@webmail.co.za \
--to=vlad@webmail.co.za \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).