linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* 3ware 7500-8 controller, hardware or software raid, kernel crash
@ 2003-05-04 12:26 Farkas Levente
  2003-05-04 13:47 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
  2003-05-04 20:25 ` Andreas Kahnt
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Farkas Levente @ 2003-05-04 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-raid, ataraid-list, Adam Radford

hi,
we buy a 3ware 7500-8 ata raid controller.we download the latest from 
everything (firmware update linux module etc). we use redhat9 with 
kernel 2.4.20-9. compile the 3ware's kernel module for this kernel which 
has plus two more changelog entry than rh9. put 8 pieces of 120GB maxtor 
hd in it. first use them as independent disks for a few days. it works 
perfectly. after that we'd like to create a hardware raid5 array with 7 
disk and one sparedisk. we do it from the controller's bios, wait to 
finish the inicialization, boot into linux create one partition on 
/dev/sda and format it to ext3. my first question :

- can we use mkfs.ext3 -R stride=16 /dev/sda1 in this case (since hardware 
raid use 64K chunk-size) or this options only for software raid?

after we format it, start to copy back the data (about 250GB) from nfs. 
after about 2 minutes the kernel crash with some kind of io error on the 
3ware controller. unfortunately we don't have time to write down the 
kernel's error message since this is one of our production enviroment 
server. what's more I wouldn't like to buy more such card to play with if 
it's not  well functional. you can read the kernel log after that crash at 
the end of this mail.

- do anybody use this card with hardware raid5?
- is it better/faster... to use hardware raid5 or software raid5?
- with this card the hardware or the software raid5 is the better choise?
- is there any better way to copy the kernel crash messages then the paper 
and pen?
thank you for your help in advance.
yours.
 -- Levente


the kernel log after the crash:
May  3 01:05:09 red kernel: 3ware Storage Controller device driver for 
Linux v1.02.00.033.
May  3 01:05:10 red kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 9 for device 02:0a.0
May  3 01:05:10 red kernel: PCI: Sharing IRQ 9 with 02:02.0
May  3 01:05:10 red kernel: scsi0 : Found a 3ware Storage Controller at 
0x9400,IRQ: 9, P-chip: 1.3
May  3 01:05:10 red kernel: scsi0 : 3ware Storage Controller
May  3 01:05:10 red kernel: 3w-xxxx: scsi0: AEN: WARNING: Unclean shutdown 
detected: Unit #0.
May  3 01:05:10 red kernel: blk: queue c365da14, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 
0xffffffff)
May  3 01:05:10 red kernel:   Vendor: 3ware     Model: Logical Disk 0    
Rev: 1.0
May  3 01:05:10 red kernel:   Type:   Direct-Access                      
ANSI SCSI revision: 00
May  3 01:05:10 red kernel: blk: queue c365dc14, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 
0xffffffff)
May  3 01:05:10 red kernel: Attached scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 
0, lun 0
May  3 01:05:11 red kernel: SCSI device sda: 1440718080 512-byte hdwr 
sectors (737648 MB)
May  3 01:05:11 red kernel:  sda: sda1

....

May  3 01:05:56 red kernel: 3w-xxxx: scsi0: AEN: INFO: Initialization 
started: Unit #0.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: 3ware 7500-8 controller, hardware or software raid, kernel crash
  2003-05-04 12:26 3ware 7500-8 controller, hardware or software raid, kernel crash Farkas Levente
@ 2003-05-04 13:47 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
  2003-05-04 20:25 ` Andreas Kahnt
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Abrahamsson @ 2003-05-04 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Farkas Levente; +Cc: linux-raid

On Sun, 4 May 2003, Farkas Levente wrote:

> - do anybody use this card with hardware raid5?

Yes.

> - is it better/faster... to use hardware raid5 or software raid5?

Use software raid5, it's faster because the kernel can cache and do more 
efficient writes. There has been extensive discussions on this list about 
that, use google to search for it.

> - with this card the hardware or the software raid5 is the better choise?

We use hardware raid5 because it feels more stable and because we don't 
care much for write speeds.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: 3ware 7500-8 controller, hardware or software raid, kernel crash
  2003-05-04 12:26 3ware 7500-8 controller, hardware or software raid, kernel crash Farkas Levente
  2003-05-04 13:47 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
@ 2003-05-04 20:25 ` Andreas Kahnt
  2003-05-05 11:22   ` Farkas Levente
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Kahnt @ 2003-05-04 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Farkas Levente; +Cc: linux-raid, ataraid-list, Adam Radford

Hi,

> after we format it, start to copy back the data (about 250GB) from nfs.
> after about 2 minutes the kernel crash with some kind of io error on the
> 3ware controller. unfortunately we don't have time to write down the
> kernel's error message since this is one of our production enviroment
> server. what's more I wouldn't like to buy more such card to play with if
> it's not  well functional. you can read the kernel log after that crash at
> the end of this mail.

We had the same problem using SuSE-8.0/2.4.18. We 'solved' the problem using
6+1 - Raid-5 and removed the 8. disk. Now the last disk is a cold spare ;-).
This work well for a couple of months uptime.

aka

Andreas.Kahnt@coware.de


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: 3ware 7500-8 controller, hardware or software raid, kernel crash
  2003-05-04 20:25 ` Andreas Kahnt
@ 2003-05-05 11:22   ` Farkas Levente
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Farkas Levente @ 2003-05-05 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Kahnt; +Cc: linux-raid, ataraid-list, Adam Radford

Andreas Kahnt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
>>after we format it, start to copy back the data (about 250GB) from nfs.
>>after about 2 minutes the kernel crash with some kind of io error on the
>>3ware controller. unfortunately we don't have time to write down the
>>kernel's error message since this is one of our production enviroment
>>server. what's more I wouldn't like to buy more such card to play with if
>>it's not  well functional. you can read the kernel log after that crash at
>>the end of this mail.
> 
> 
> We had the same problem using SuSE-8.0/2.4.18. We 'solved' the problem using
> 6+1 - Raid-5 and removed the 8. disk. Now the last disk is a cold spare ;-).
> This work well for a couple of months uptime.

are you kidding? hmm:-((
this is the truth??? I'm getting said:-(
do the 3ware are aware of this?
we'd like to buy more such cards, but we've a few server in which 7+1 is 
required....
or it's better if I use software raid and in that case the above problem 
doesn't occure what's more I've got better performance?

-- 
   Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-05 11:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-04 12:26 3ware 7500-8 controller, hardware or software raid, kernel crash Farkas Levente
2003-05-04 13:47 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2003-05-04 20:25 ` Andreas Kahnt
2003-05-05 11:22   ` Farkas Levente

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).