From: Herta Van den Eynde <herta.vandeneynde@cc.kuleuven.ac.be>
To: Paul Clements <Paul.Clements@SteelEye.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: what happens to raid when more disks are added?
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 10:10:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EBA10FA.2020004@cc.kuleuven.ac.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3EB93643.D55A2AD5@SteelEye.com
Paul Clements wrote:
>Herta Van den Eynde wrote:
>
>
>
>>To linux, they are known as devices sd[c-h], which have been configured
>>as raid 0+1:
>>
>># cat /proc/mdstat
>>Personalities : [raid0] [raid1]
>>read_ahead 1024 sectors
>>md2 : active raid1 md1[1] md0[0]
>> 106679168 blocks [2/2] [UU]
>>
>>md0 : active raid0 sde1[2] sdd1[1] sdc1[0]
>> 106679232 blocks 8k chunks
>>
>>md1 : active raid0 sdh1[2] sdg1[1] sdf1[0]
>> 106679232 blocks 8k chunks
>>
>>unused devices: <none>
>>
>>
>
>It's generally thought to be better to set this up as a RAID 1+0 (three
>raid1 devices striped together) but maybe there's a reason why you've
>opted for the RAID 0+1? (there's one less md device, I guess)...
>
>
>
>
>>When I need to add extra disks, e.g. in slots 3 and 12, I assume that
>>the disk in slot 3 will get device name /dev/sdf, and the disks in slots
>>9 through 12 will subsequently be known as /dev/sd[g-j]. How will that
>>affect the raid 0+1 config?
>>
>>
>
>You may want to think about using the autodetection feature of md (or
>mdadm's UUID capability)... these would allow you to avoid messing
>things up if your drive letters shift on you...
>
>--
>Paul
>
>
Thanks, Paul.
Raid 1+0 definitely was and is on my wish list, but when I set up the
initial systems, I had no time to play around and check things out. I
was nervous about the potential impact of devices changing names, and
figured that it'd be easier to manage with a raid 0+1, as it'd be easy
to break the mirror and take it from there.
I've got a bit more time now, so I'll check out autodetection and uuid.
Kind regards,
Herta
--
******************************************************
Herta Van den Eynde
Toledo system management
K.U.Leuven - Ludit
W.de Croylaan 52A
B-3001 Heverlee
Belgium
tel: +32 (0)16 322 166
fax: +32 (0)16 322 999
******************************************************
"For something fulfilled this hour, loved or endured."
(W.H. Auden)
******************************************************
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-08 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-07 15:44 what happens to raid when more disks are added? Herta Van den Eynde
2003-05-07 16:37 ` Paul Clements
2003-05-08 8:10 ` Herta Van den Eynde [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EBA10FA.2020004@cc.kuleuven.ac.be \
--to=herta.vandeneynde@cc.kuleuven.ac.be \
--cc=Paul.Clements@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).