linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Finlay <finlay@moeraki.com>
To: Jose Luis Domingo Lopez <linux-raid@24x7linux.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Veritas Volume Manager
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 13:08:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EC2A232.8070308@moeraki.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030514194644.GB6949@localhost

Hi Jose,

I am assuming that this list is about linux raid and that the Veritas 
products are raid products on linux. I assume that this list is not 
restricted to discussions about free raid implementations. If I want 
marketing fluff I can get that from the Veritas site but I'm interested 
in why real people would use Veritas on linux or why not. So far it 
seems that the cons are lack of broad support for various linux kernels 
and cost (which is not on the web site) and the pro is a professional 
mature stable product. The current crop of free linux raid tools (MD and 
LVM) seem really primitive and inflexible and having experience with 
Veritas in a previous life on Solaris (where it's really expensive) I 
was wondering if the linux version was as good and whether people felt 
it was worth spending the money to get the Veritas features. Of course 
it's possible that Veritas is overkill for the seemingly limited 
capabilities and application of the current linux PC type systems and of 
course the Veritas stuff might not cover all the possible hardware 
configurations that are available for linux.

Thanks

John

Jose Luis Domingo Lopez wrote:

>On Wednesday, 14 May 2003, at 10:19:25 -0700,
>John Finlay wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Thanks for the info. My impression is that the Veritas VM has a lot more 
>>features than MD/LVM including management tools, on-line 
>>reconfiguration, etc. These seem like valuable features. What's the cost 
>>of VVM?
>>
>>    
>>
>You can (and should) always go to the vendor's website and look there,
>because this list is not about Veritas products and/or marketing/sales.
>
>  
>



  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-14 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-14 11:48 Veritas Volume Manager Buechler, Mark R
2003-05-14 17:19 ` John Finlay
2003-05-14 19:46   ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
2003-05-14 20:08     ` John Finlay [this message]
2003-05-14 20:27       ` John DeFranco
2003-05-15  2:47         ` RAID startup problem Maurice Hilarius
2003-05-15  3:12           ` Stephen Lee
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-14  8:52 Veritas Volume Manager John Finlay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3EC2A232.8070308@moeraki.com \
    --to=finlay@moeraki.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@24x7linux.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).