From: Paul Clements <Paul.Clements@SteelEye.com>
To: 3tcdgwg3 <3tcdgwg3@prodigy.net>
Cc: Stef Telford <stef@chronozon.artofdns.com>,
'Greg Rasberry' <rgreg-r@pacbell.net>,
'Linux raid mailing list' <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Software RAID level 1 issue
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 16:31:19 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ED7BF97.BAB11B12@SteelEye.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 01f101c326e7$c9084890$7b07a8c0@pluto
3tcdgwg3 wrote:
> If there is a plan to do a "intelligent resync", like some of the raid
> controller
> vendors offer? The resync process will be hold on, if there are IO requests
> from upper level, and resumed when there is no IO. By doing that, the
> system
> performance always be on the top. I am very interested in having something
> like that.
This wasn't exactly what I meant by intelligent resync, but...I think
what you're asking about is something that the md driver already does to
some extent. It will slow down a resync if there is active I/O on the
device. This can even be tuned by the user by manipulating a couple of
kernel sysctls:
apache:~# cat /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_min
100
apache:~# cat /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
10000
apache:~# echo 1000000 > /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
apache:~# cat /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_max
1000000
These are in KB/s.
The "min" refers to the maximum I/O bandwidth that will be consumed by
resyncs before the resyncs get throttled, when there is other I/O
activity on the device.
The "max" refers to the maximum I/O bandwidth that will be consumed by
resyncs before the resyncs get throttled, even if there is no other I/O
activity on the device.
--
Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-30 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-30 18:28 Software RAID level 1 issue Brian Schwarz
2003-05-30 18:40 ` Robert L. Harris
2003-05-31 17:44 ` Stef Telford
2003-05-30 20:01 ` Paul Clements
2003-05-30 20:12 ` 3tcdgwg3
2003-05-30 20:31 ` Paul Clements [this message]
2003-06-02 18:10 ` 3tcdgwg3
2003-06-02 18:16 ` Paul Clements
2003-11-07 7:29 ` Software RAID level performance 3tcdgwg3
2003-05-31 19:39 ` Software RAID level 1 issue Stef Telford
2003-05-30 21:44 ` Robert L. Harris
2003-05-30 22:04 ` Paul Clements
2003-05-30 23:32 ` Robert L. Harris
2003-05-31 20:21 ` Gregory Leblanc
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-30 17:53 Adriana Rasberry
2003-05-30 17:53 Greg Rasberry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ED7BF97.BAB11B12@SteelEye.com \
--to=paul.clements@steeleye.com \
--cc=3tcdgwg3@prodigy.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgreg-r@pacbell.net \
--cc=stef@chronozon.artofdns.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).