* Supporting Promise RAID5?
@ 2003-09-12 17:18 Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2003-09-12 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid; +Cc: Arjan van de Ven, neilb
So, Promise is interested in working with the open source community to
support their metadata formats. Their customers (and I) are pushing
them to support "Linux RAID" (i.e. md), but they want to be able to
support their existing customers as well.
This email is basically a two part question: what's the best for 2.4?
and 2.6?
For 2.4, it's basically a dead end branch, IMO. Any 2.6 solution will
likely be different. So my suggestion here is to use as much of md's
raid5 logic as possible. Either share code -- where possible -- and
copy code where not. The idea is to not reinvent a raid5 engine, and
also leave 2.4 md alone as much as possible.
For 2.6, there are several possibilities. Arjan (ataraid maintainer)
has been pondering going through device mapper. In another email, NeilB
pointed out to me that 2.6 md is well on its way to supporting pluggable
metadata formats.
I'm interested in input mainly on 2.6, but welcome suggestions for 2.4
as well. One key point that Arjan repeatedly points out to me is that
md doesn't support partitions (in 2.4 at least, if not 2.6).
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-09-12 17:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-12 17:18 Supporting Promise RAID5? Jeff Garzik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).