From: jshankar <jshankar@CS.ColoState.EDU>
To: linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: chunk size.
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 15:54:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F950B86@webmail.colostate.edu> (raw)
For raid devices, i have observed that if size of bytes written is greater
than the chunk size the read,write performance decreases.For size lesser than
the chunk size the performance improves.
Please let me know your opinion.
Thanks
Jay
next reply other threads:[~2003-10-18 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-18 21:54 jshankar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-21 4:03 Chunk Size Rolf Schatzmann
2009-04-02 8:57 chunk size CoolCold
2009-04-02 9:46 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F950B86@webmail.colostate.edu \
--to=jshankar@cs.colostate.edu \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).