linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dirk Hufnagel <hufnagel@mps.ohio-state.edu>
To: AndyLiebman@aol.com
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS RAID only writing half the time
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:26:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FC3ACF9.4000509@mps.ohio-state.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <114.2c0b3fa3.2cf4ee43@aol.com>

AndyLiebman@aol.com wrote:
> Hendrik, 

<snip>

> I'm going to want to try to come up with some settings that allow capturing 
> uncompressed video (18 MB/sec) while one or two other users are trying to read 
> DV video (3.5 MB/sec) from the same drives. I guess that means I will want get 
> the cache written to disk as soon as possible (leaving margin for difficult 
> moments) while allowing other users to read from the disk on demand. In some 
> ways, reading video files is more demanding than writing -- because what is read 
> MUST arrive at the client computer exactly when needed. 

Could be problematic since you can't just add bandwidth requierements
and compare it to the maximum bandwidth. Multiple active disk access
jobs means that the disk will be seeking, which means that the read
accesses will interfere with your write stream, possible to a point
where the writing will skip.

If you are not writing 24/7 and it's in your budget, I would put two
RAID arrays into the machine, one to write to and the other one
for reading. You can synchronize them whenever you are not writing.
Of course, that only works if you don't need to read the written
data immediatly. For the read array I would use Raid5 for the data
security and for the write array you can either use Raid5 or Raid0.
Raid0 is faster compared to Raid5, especially for writes, but it
would mean your data isn't secure until it has been copied to the
other Raid5 array.

	Dirk

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-11-25 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-25 17:41 XFS RAID only writing half the time AndyLiebman
2003-11-25 18:57 ` Hendrik Visage
2003-11-25 19:26 ` Dirk Hufnagel [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-25 15:07 AndyLiebman
2003-11-25 15:40 ` Hendrik Visage
2003-11-25 16:01   ` Net Llama!

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FC3ACF9.4000509@mps.ohio-state.edu \
    --to=hufnagel@mps.ohio-state.edu \
    --cc=AndyLiebman@aol.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).