From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Daniel Brahneborg <daniel.com@wtnord.net>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Status of Promise drivers?
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:06:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FF1CCC1.3050304@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031230200012.C14399@nettis.grimsta>
Daniel Brahneborg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having serious problems with my Silicon Image SATA card,
> and am considering replacing with a (more expensive) Promise
> SATA TX2 Plus card.
>
> First I have some questions, to avoid getting into the same
> mess as I'm in now.
>
> 1. What is the status of the Promise driver? Stable for
> everybody? (The SI3112 has problems for some people when
> using the IDE driver, and for some with the SCSI driver.)
> A binary module is ok, a binary bzImage definately is not.
It's beta, and stable.
> 2. Has anybody used the driver on an Abit KV7 motherboard?
>
> 3. Has anybody used it with *2* network cards? Bonus
> points for the builtin Via Rhine and an 8139 card.
> (The SCSI driver for the SI3112 kills the machine when a
> second card is activated.)
>
> 4. Has anybody used it together with two other disks on the
> VIA SATA interface on the KV7?
>
> 5. Has anybody used it for a Raid5 setup? (With SI3112 Raid1
> works better than Raid5, since Raid5 gives corrupted files
> all over the place and Raid1 only corrupts them once in
> a while.)
Any comparison with Silicon Image is false. The Silicon Image driver
has been repeatedly stated (by me, the author) to be BROKEN. It is
thusly marked with CONFIG_BROKEN.
Those who ignore the author stating the Silicon Image driver is _alpha_
and unfinished do so at their own risk.
> 6. Has anybody used it in a non-root setup, having hda on
> the PATA interface? (The SI3112 causes lots of problems
> with I/O port and IRQ conflicts, requiring hours of
> tweaking of the boot parameters.)
PATA interfaces on Promise SATA are not yet supported.
> 7. Do you have DMA enabled? (SI3112 without DMA works fine,
> but with terrible performance.)
DMA cannot be disabled :)
> 8. Do you get decent performance? (The 5MB/sec I get without
> DMA on the SI3112 card is _not_ decent.)
Performance is far beyond this.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-30 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-30 19:00 Status of Promise drivers? Daniel Brahneborg
2003-12-30 19:06 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2003-12-30 19:24 ` Daniel Brahneborg
2003-12-30 19:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-30 20:18 ` Daniel Brahneborg
2003-12-30 20:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-30 20:38 ` Daniel Brahneborg
2003-12-30 23:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-01-10 15:14 ` Daniel Brahneborg
2003-12-30 20:21 ` Hendrik Visage
2003-12-30 20:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-03 18:23 ` Daniel Brahneborg
2004-02-04 15:02 ` Gunnlaugur Thor Briem
2004-02-06 21:13 ` Gunnlaugur Thor Briem
2003-12-30 23:21 ` Status of HighPoint / " Daniel Brahneborg
2003-12-30 23:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-30 23:55 ` jlewis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FF1CCC1.3050304@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=daniel.com@wtnord.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).